1995 Mazda Bongo — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 1,805 MOT tests, the 1995 Mazda Bongo recorded a 64.7% pass rate. Against MPVs of a similar age (32.3% fail rate), the 1995 Bongo comes out 3.0pp worse. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and body, structure & corrosion.

65%
Pass rate
1,805
MOT tests analysed
35.3%
Fail rate
worse than
vs MPVs of similar age
28.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (22.7%) and lighting & signalling (22.4%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, integral vehicle structure condition and chassis condition — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 595 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 1995 Bongo fails 35.1% of the time in the 60-90k band and 37.1% at 150k+, a spread of only 1.9 points.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 36.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 28.4% of tests failed in 2021 against 35.7% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1995 Bongo 35.3% MPVs avg 32.3% National avg 24.0%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1995 Mazda Bongo
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 22.7% 410
2 Lighting & signalling 22.4% 404
3 Body, structure & corrosion 15.7% 284
4 Brakes 10.9% 197
5 Visibility 8.4% 152
6 Steering 6.2% 111
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 22.7% Lighting & signalling 22.4% Body, structure & corrosion 15.7% Brakes 10.9% Visibility 8.4% Steering 6.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1995 Mazda Bongo
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas595
2Integral vehicle structure condition216
3Chassis condition197
4Rear fog lamp169
5Headlamp143
6Prescribed areas136

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1995 Mazda Bongo
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 36.7% 663
2 Brakes 30.3% 546
3 Emissions & environmental 26.0% 469
4 Body, structure & corrosion 22.7% 409
5 Tyres 18.5% 334
6 Lighting & signalling 14.5% 262

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 35.1% 90-120k 32.2% 120-150k 33.7% 150k+ 37.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1995 Bongo
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 111 35.1%
90-120k 301 32.2%
120-150k 433 33.7%
150k+ 939 37.1%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1995 Bongo
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 218 28.4%
2022 207 33.8%
2023 184 33.7%
2024 633 38.2%
2025 563 35.7%

What to check before buying a 1995 Bongo

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 22.7% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1995 Mazda Bongos pass their MOT?

64.7% of the 1,805 1995 Mazda Bongo MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 35.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1995 Mazda Bongo?

Suspension, recorded in 22.7% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (22.4%).

Does the 1995 Bongo get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 35.1% in the 60-90k band to 37.1% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,805 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data