2008 Lexus Ls600H — MOT failures & pass rate

855 MOT tests on the 2008 Lexus Ls600H are in this dataset, and 89.1% of them passed. That is 15.4 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 26.3%. Failures cluster in tyres, lighting & signalling and brakes.

89%
Pass rate
855
MOT tests analysed
10.9%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
15
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — tyres (4.1%) and lighting & signalling (3.2%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are pins and bushes, headlamp aim and rbt (sp) — pins and bushes alone was recorded 24 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2008 Ls600H fails 10.3% of the time in the 30-60k band and 12.8% at 150k+, a spread of only 2.5 points.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 21.4% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 Ls600H 10.9% cars avg 22.5% National avg 26.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Lexus Ls600H
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 4.1% 35
2 Lighting & signalling 3.2% 27
3 Brakes 2.8% 24
4 Suspension 2.6% 22
5 Visibility 2.0% 17
6 Body, structure & corrosion 1.3% 11
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 4.1% Lighting & signalling 3.2% Brakes 2.8% Suspension 2.6% Visibility 2.0% Body, structure & corrosion 1.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Lexus Ls600H
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Pins and bushes24
2Headlamp aim19
3Rbt (sp)14
4Tread depth14
5Wipers13
6Shock absorbers8

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Lexus Ls600H
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 21.4% 183
2 Suspension 18.7% 160
3 Brakes 17.1% 146
4 Visibility 5.0% 43
5 Body, structure & corrosion 5.0% 43
6 Other defects 4.6% 39

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 10.3% 60-90k 8.1% 90-120k 9.4% 120-150k 12.9% 150k+ 12.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 Ls600H
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 87 10.3%
60-90k 173 8.1%
90-120k 191 9.4%
120-150k 178 12.9%
150k+ 218 12.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 11.2% 14 yrs 8.9% 15 yrs 10.7% 16 yrs 12.1% 17 yrs 11.7%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2008 Ls600H
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Hybrid 763 11.0%
Petrol 34 5.9%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 Ls600H
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 170 11.2%
2022 180 8.9%
2023 168 10.7%
2024 174 12.1%
2025 163 11.7%

What to check before buying a 2008 Ls600H

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: tyres accounted for 4.1% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Lexus Ls600Hs pass their MOT?

89.1% of the 855 2008 Lexus Ls600H MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 10.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Lexus Ls600H?

Tyres, recorded in 4.1% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (3.2%).

Does the 2008 Ls600H get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 10.3% in the 30-60k band to 12.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 855 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data