2002 Jeep Wrangler — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 367 MOT tests, the 2002 Jeep Wrangler recorded a 77.7% pass rate. Large SUVs of a similar age fail 25.2% of the time, so this is 2.9pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

78%
Pass rate
367
MOT tests analysed
22.3%
Fail rate
better than
vs large SUVs of similar age
21
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.7% of tests against 8.7% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are rear fog lamp, headlamp aim and linkage pins and bushes — rear fog lamp alone was recorded 20 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 34.4% versus 20.0%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 35.4% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 23.4% in 2021 to 21.9% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Wrangler 22.3% large SUVs avg 25.2% National avg 27.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Jeep Wrangler
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 14.7% 54
2 Brakes 8.7% 32
3 Suspension 8.5% 31
4 Visibility 4.6% 17
5 Body, structure & corrosion 3.5% 13
6 Steering 2.7% 10
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 14.7% Brakes 8.7% Suspension 8.5% Visibility 4.6% Body, structure & corrosion 3.5% Steering 2.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Jeep Wrangler
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rear fog lamp20
2Headlamp aim17
3Linkage pins and bushes16
4Stop lamp15
5Wipers15
6Rigid brake pipes15

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Jeep Wrangler
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 35.4% 130
2 Brakes 24.0% 88
3 Emissions & environmental 12.8% 47
4 Tyres 11.4% 42
5 Lighting & signalling 10.3% 38
6 Body, structure & corrosion 7.6% 28

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 20.0% 60-90k 19.6% 90-120k 25.9% 120-150k 34.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Wrangler
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 70 20.0%
60-90k 189 19.6%
90-120k 58 25.9%
120-150k 32 34.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 23.4% 20 yrs 19.5% 21 yrs 25.6% 22 yrs 21.3% 23 yrs 21.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Wrangler
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 64 23.4%
2022 77 19.5%
2023 78 25.6%
2024 75 21.3%
2025 73 21.9%

What to check before buying a 2002 Wrangler

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 14.7% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Jeep Wranglers pass their MOT?

77.7% of the 367 2002 Jeep Wrangler MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 22.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Jeep Wrangler?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.7% of tests, followed by brakes (8.7%).

Does the 2002 Wrangler get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 20.0% in the 30-60k band to 34.4% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 367 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data