2005 Jaguar Xjr — MOT failures & pass rate

530 MOT tests on the 2005 Jaguar Xjr are in this dataset, and 80.4% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (27.7% fail rate), the 2005 Xjr comes out 8.0pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

80%
Pass rate
530
MOT tests analysed
19.6%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
18.1
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (8.5%) and suspension (7.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint dust cover, rigid brake pipes and track rod end — ball joint dust cover alone was recorded 47 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 22.5% versus 7.9%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 25.5% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 15.0% of tests failed in 2021 against 23.4% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 Xjr 19.6% cars avg 24.1% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Jaguar Xjr
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 8.5% 45
2 Suspension 7.7% 41
3 Brakes 7.5% 40
4 Emissions & environmental 5.9% 31
5 Tyres 4.0% 21
6 Steering 3.6% 19
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 8.5% Suspension 7.7% Brakes 7.5% Emissions & environmental 5.9% Tyres 4.0% Steering 3.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Jaguar Xjr
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint dust cover47
2Rigid brake pipes34
3Track rod end26
4Malfunction indicator lamp23
5Pins and bushes17
6Catalyst emissions15

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Jaguar Xjr
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 25.5% 135
2 Suspension 24.3% 129
3 Tyres 19.1% 101
4 Lighting & signalling 9.1% 48
5 Emissions & environmental 6.0% 32
6 Steering 5.3% 28

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 7.9% 60-90k 18.8% 90-120k 23.2% 120-150k 20.2% 150k+ 22.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 Xjr
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 38 7.9%
60-90k 165 18.8%
90-120k 155 23.2%
120-150k 89 20.2%
150k+ 71 22.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 15.0% 17 yrs 18.5% 18 yrs 20.9% 19 yrs 19.6% 20 yrs 23.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 Xjr
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 93 15.0%
2022 108 18.5%
2023 115 20.9%
2024 107 19.6%
2025 107 23.4%

What to check before buying a 2005 Xjr

On a 2005 Xjr, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 8.5% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Jaguar Xjrs pass their MOT?

80.4% of the 530 2005 Jaguar Xjr MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 19.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Jaguar Xjr?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 8.5% of tests, followed by suspension (7.7%).

Does the 2005 Xjr get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 7.9% in the 30-60k band to 22.5% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 530 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data