2004 Jaguar Xjr — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2004 Jaguar Xjr passed 78.2% of its 1,055 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (27.7% fail rate), the 2004 Xjr comes out 5.9pp better. Failures cluster in suspension, brakes and emissions & environmental.

78%
Pass rate
1,055
MOT tests analysed
21.8%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
19
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: suspension, recorded in 10.2% of tests against 7.1% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint dust cover, track rod end and malfunction indicator lamp — ball joint dust cover alone was recorded 130 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2004 Xjr fails 22.1% of the time in the 30-60k band and 22.7% at 150k+, a spread of only 0.6 points.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 27.2% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 21.4% of tests failed in 2021 against 22.9% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2004 Xjr 21.8% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2004 Jaguar Xjr
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 10.2% 108
2 Brakes 7.1% 75
3 Emissions & environmental 6.2% 65
4 Lighting & signalling 5.6% 59
5 Tyres 4.2% 44
6 Steering 4.0% 42
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 10.2% Brakes 7.1% Emissions & environmental 6.2% Lighting & signalling 5.6% Tyres 4.2% Steering 4.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2004 Jaguar Xjr
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint dust cover130
2Track rod end59
3Malfunction indicator lamp53
4Rigid brake pipes43
5Pins and bushes37
6Linkage ball joint dust cover35

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2004 Jaguar Xjr
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 27.2% 287
2 Suspension 25.3% 267
3 Tyres 16.0% 169
4 Lighting & signalling 8.3% 88
5 Steering 6.3% 66
6 Emissions & environmental 5.2% 55

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 22.1% 60-90k 20.7% 90-120k 20.5% 120-150k 24.0% 150k+ 22.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2004 Xjr
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 86 22.1%
60-90k 261 20.7%
90-120k 288 20.5%
120-150k 254 24.0%
150k+ 163 22.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 17 yrs 21.4% 18 yrs 19.5% 19 yrs 22.1% 20 yrs 23.4% 21 yrs 22.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2004 Xjr
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 215 21.4%
2022 221 19.5%
2023 213 22.1%
2024 201 23.4%
2025 205 22.9%

What to check before buying a 2004 Xjr

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 10.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2004 Jaguar Xjrs pass their MOT?

78.2% of the 1,055 2004 Jaguar Xjr MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 21.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2004 Jaguar Xjr?

Suspension, recorded in 10.2% of tests, followed by brakes (7.1%).

Does the 2004 Xjr get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 22.1% in the 30-60k band to 22.7% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,055 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data