2003 Jaguar XJ — MOT failures & pass rate

10,435 MOT tests on the 2003 Jaguar XJ are in this dataset, and 78.8% of them passed. Executive cars of a similar age fail 24.4% of the time, so this is 3.2pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in suspension, brakes and lighting & signalling.

79%
Pass rate
10,435
MOT tests analysed
21.2%
Fail rate
better than
vs executive cars of similar age
19.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (10.2%) and brakes (8.3%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint dust cover, track rod end and rigid brake pipes — ball joint dust cover alone was recorded 1,117 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 23.9% versus 14.2%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 32.8% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2003 XJ 21.2% executive cars avg 24.4% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2003 Jaguar XJ
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 10.2% 1,062
2 Brakes 8.3% 869
3 Lighting & signalling 8.2% 850
4 Visibility 4.6% 483
5 Emissions & environmental 4.0% 415
6 Steering 3.7% 388
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 10.2% Brakes 8.3% Lighting & signalling 8.2% Visibility 4.6% Emissions & environmental 4.0% Steering 3.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2003 Jaguar XJ
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint dust cover1,117
2Track rod end551
3Rigid brake pipes470
4Pins and bushes441
5Headlamp aim383
6Linkage ball joint dust cover321

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2003 Jaguar XJ
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 32.8% 3,417
2 Brakes 31.1% 3,240
3 Tyres 20.1% 2,096
4 Emissions & environmental 12.7% 1,329
5 Lighting & signalling 8.6% 894
6 Steering 6.3% 653

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 14.2% 30-60k 15.3% 60-90k 20.0% 90-120k 21.4% 120-150k 22.7% 150k+ 23.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2003 XJ
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 169 14.2%
30-60k 875 15.3%
60-90k 2,192 20.0%
90-120k 3,202 21.4%
120-150k 2,427 22.7%
150k+ 1,550 23.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 18 yrs 21.9% 19 yrs 20.4% 20 yrs 21.3% 21 yrs 20.9% 22 yrs 21.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2003 XJ
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 2,409 21.9%
2022 2,215 20.4%
2023 2,124 21.3%
2024 1,934 20.9%
2025 1,753 21.3%

What to check before buying a 2003 XJ

On a 2003 XJ, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 10.2% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2003 Jaguar XJs pass their MOT?

78.8% of the 10,435 2003 Jaguar XJ MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 21.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2003 Jaguar XJ?

Suspension, recorded in 10.2% of tests, followed by brakes (8.3%).

Does the 2003 XJ get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 14.2% in the 0-30k band to 23.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 10,435 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data