2006 Isuzu Rodeo — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2006 Isuzu Rodeo passed 70.4% of its 4,150 recorded MOT tests. Pick-up trucks of a similar age fail at 29.0%, so the 2006 Rodeo sits squarely on the average. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and body, structure & corrosion.

70%
Pass rate
4,150
MOT tests analysed
29.6%
Fail rate
in line with
vs pick-up trucks of similar age
16.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (18.7%) and suspension (16.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are chassis condition, ball joint and rear fog lamp — chassis condition alone was recorded 413 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 31.6% versus 17.2%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 45.7% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2006 Rodeo 29.6% pick-up trucks avg 29.0% National avg 27.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2006 Isuzu Rodeo
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 18.7% 776
2 Suspension 16.5% 683
3 Body, structure & corrosion 12.2% 508
4 Brakes 11.7% 487
5 Visibility 7.5% 312
6 Steering 6.7% 276
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 18.7% Suspension 16.5% Body, structure & corrosion 12.2% Brakes 11.7% Visibility 7.5% Steering 6.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2006 Isuzu Rodeo
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Chassis condition413
2Ball joint372
3Rear fog lamp368
4Track rod end321
5Position lamp236
6Stop lamp233

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2006 Isuzu Rodeo
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 45.7% 1,898
2 Brakes 33.7% 1,400
3 Body, structure & corrosion 24.4% 1,013
4 Tyres 21.1% 875
5 Emissions & environmental 16.4% 682
6 Lighting & signalling 16.2% 673

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 17.2% 60-90k 26.4% 90-120k 29.9% 120-150k 29.9% 150k+ 31.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2006 Rodeo
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 134 17.2%
60-90k 545 26.4%
90-120k 855 29.9%
120-150k 1,198 29.9%
150k+ 1,404 31.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 15 yrs 29.6% 16 yrs 28.7% 17 yrs 30.1% 18 yrs 30.9% 19 yrs 28.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2006 Rodeo
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,062 29.6%
2022 953 28.7%
2023 831 30.1%
2024 731 30.9%
2025 573 28.4%

What to check before buying a 2006 Rodeo

On a 2006 Rodeo, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 18.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2006 Isuzu Rodeos pass their MOT?

70.4% of the 4,150 2006 Isuzu Rodeo MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 29.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2006 Isuzu Rodeo?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 18.7% of tests, followed by suspension (16.5%).

Does the 2006 Rodeo get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 17.2% in the 30-60k band to 31.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 4,150 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data