2005 Isuzu Rodeo — MOT failures & pass rate

3,847 MOT tests on the 2005 Isuzu Rodeo are in this dataset, and 71.9% of them passed. That is effectively the same as pick-up trucks of a similar age (29.0% fail rate), so the MOT record here is unremarkable in either direction. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

72%
Pass rate
3,847
MOT tests analysed
28.1%
Fail rate
in line with
vs pick-up trucks of similar age
17.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 18.8% of tests against 15.7% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are rear fog lamp, ball joint and chassis condition — rear fog lamp alone was recorded 387 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 30.3% versus 19.9%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 43.1% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 Rodeo 28.1% pick-up trucks avg 29.0% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Isuzu Rodeo
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 18.8% 722
2 Suspension 15.7% 605
3 Brakes 12.6% 483
4 Body, structure & corrosion 10.8% 417
5 Visibility 7.7% 295
6 Steering 5.9% 226
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 18.8% Suspension 15.7% Brakes 12.6% Body, structure & corrosion 10.8% Visibility 7.7% Steering 5.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Isuzu Rodeo
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rear fog lamp387
2Ball joint286
3Chassis condition252
4Track rod end234
5Position lamp224
6Rigid brake pipes195

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Isuzu Rodeo
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 43.1% 1,657
2 Brakes 32.5% 1,252
3 Body, structure & corrosion 25.6% 984
4 Tyres 20.3% 780
5 Emissions & environmental 15.8% 607
6 Lighting & signalling 14.1% 543

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 19.9% 60-90k 26.2% 90-120k 26.6% 120-150k 29.4% 150k+ 30.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 Rodeo
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 191 19.9%
60-90k 511 26.2%
90-120k 793 26.6%
120-150k 1,018 29.4%
150k+ 1,315 30.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 28.1% 17 yrs 27.9% 18 yrs 29.4% 19 yrs 28.3% 20 yrs 26.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 Rodeo
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,011 28.1%
2022 882 27.9%
2023 778 29.4%
2024 658 28.3%
2025 518 26.6%

What to check before buying a 2005 Rodeo

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 18.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Isuzu Rodeos pass their MOT?

71.9% of the 3,847 2005 Isuzu Rodeo MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 28.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Isuzu Rodeo?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 18.8% of tests, followed by suspension (15.7%).

Does the 2005 Rodeo get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 19.9% in the 30-60k band to 30.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 3,847 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data