2016 Hyundai i40 — MOT failures & pass rate

20,634 MOT tests on the 2016 Hyundai i40 are in this dataset, and 85.9% of them passed. Against large family cars of a similar age (15.3% fail rate), the 2016 i40 comes out 1.1pp better. Failures cluster in tyres, brakes and lighting & signalling.

86%
Pass rate
20,634
MOT tests analysed
14.1%
Fail rate
better than
vs large family cars of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — tyres (6.2%) and brakes (4.9%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are brake pads, tread depth and headlamp — brake pads alone was recorded 730 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 8.6% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 18.8% once past 150k — 2.2× the risk.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 25.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 13.0% of tests failed in 2021 against 15.3% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 i40 14.1% large family cars avg 15.3% National avg 14.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Hyundai i40
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 6.2% 1,278
2 Brakes 4.9% 1,002
3 Lighting & signalling 4.6% 946
4 Visibility 2.6% 530
5 Suspension 2.4% 499
6 Emissions & environmental 1.2% 249
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 6.2% Brakes 4.9% Lighting & signalling 4.6% Visibility 2.6% Suspension 2.4% Emissions & environmental 1.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Hyundai i40
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Brake pads730
2Tread depth602
3Headlamp471
4Wipers425
5Headlamp aim394
6Tyre pressure monitoring system302

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Hyundai i40
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 25.7% 5,304
2 Brakes 22.5% 4,641
3 Other defects 8.6% 1,776
4 Suspension 4.3% 897
5 Visibility 3.4% 693
6 Emissions & environmental 3.3% 681

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.6% 30-60k 12.1% 60-90k 13.9% 90-120k 15.8% 120-150k 17.0% 150k+ 18.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 i40
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 884 8.6%
30-60k 5,778 12.1%
60-90k 7,012 13.9%
90-120k 3,755 15.8%
120-150k 1,748 17.0%
150k+ 1,456 18.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 13.0% 6 yrs 12.6% 7 yrs 14.5% 8 yrs 15.3% 9 yrs 15.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 i40
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 4,232 13.0%
2022 4,197 12.6%
2023 4,201 14.5%
2024 4,096 15.3%
2025 3,908 15.3%

What to check before buying a 2016 i40

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: tyres accounted for 6.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Hyundai i40s pass their MOT?

85.9% of the 20,634 2016 Hyundai i40 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 14.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Hyundai i40?

Tyres, recorded in 6.2% of tests, followed by brakes (4.9%).

Does the 2016 i40 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.6% in the 0-30k band to 18.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 20,634 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data