2017 Hyundai i10 — MOT failures & pass rate

131,874 MOT tests on the 2017 Hyundai i10 are in this dataset, and 89.6% of them passed. Against city cars of a similar age (11.7% fail rate), the 2017 i10 comes out 1.3pp better. Failures cluster in visibility, brakes and tyres.

90%
Pass rate
131,874
MOT tests analysed
10.4%
Fail rate
better than
vs city cars of similar age
6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — visibility (4.8%) and brakes (4.6%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are wipers, brake pads and brake discs — wipers alone was recorded 5,059 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 22.6% versus 7.2%.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 23.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 7.3% of tests failed in 2021 against 12.4% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2017 i10 10.4% city cars avg 11.7% National avg 12.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2017 Hyundai i10
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Visibility 4.8% 6,351
2 Brakes 4.6% 6,087
3 Tyres 3.9% 5,078
4 Lighting & signalling 2.6% 3,417
5 Steering 0.7% 968
6 Emissions & environmental 0.4% 577
Share of tests failing on each category Visibility 4.8% Brakes 4.6% Tyres 3.9% Lighting & signalling 2.6% Steering 0.7% Emissions & environmental 0.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2017 Hyundai i10
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Wipers5,059
2Brake pads2,978
3Brake discs2,850
4Washers2,800
5Tread depth2,496
6Headlamp aim2,006

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2017 Hyundai i10
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 23.0% 30,311
2 Tyres 22.0% 29,039
3 Other defects 5.2% 6,913
4 Visibility 2.9% 3,873
5 Emissions & environmental 1.3% 1,645
6 Suspension 1.0% 1,373

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 7.2% 30-60k 12.6% 60-90k 17.2% 90-120k 20.6% 120-150k 23.0% 150k+ 22.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2017 i10
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 65,099 7.2%
30-60k 54,424 12.6%
60-90k 10,837 17.2%
90-120k 1,318 20.6%
120-150k 161 23.0%
150k+ 31 22.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 4 yrs 7.3% 5 yrs 9.4% 6 yrs 10.8% 7 yrs 12.1% 8 yrs 12.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2017 i10
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 25,693 7.3%
2022 26,233 9.4%
2023 26,591 10.8%
2024 26,567 12.1%
2025 26,790 12.4%

What to check before buying a 2017 i10

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: visibility accounted for 4.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2017 Hyundai i10s pass their MOT?

89.6% of the 131,874 2017 Hyundai i10 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 10.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2017 Hyundai i10?

Visibility, recorded in 4.8% of tests, followed by brakes (4.6%).

Does the 2017 i10 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 7.2% in the 0-30k band to 22.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 131,874 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data