2016 Hyundai i10 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 124,966 MOT tests, the 2016 Hyundai i10 recorded an 88.2% pass rate. That is 1.8 percentage points better than city cars of a similar age, which fail at 13.7%. Failures cluster in brakes, visibility and tyres.

88%
Pass rate
124,966
MOT tests analysed
11.8%
Fail rate
better than
vs city cars of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (5.6%) and visibility (5.0%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are wipers, brake pads and washers — wipers alone was recorded 4,739 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 8.3% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 25.4% once past 150k — 3.1× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 24.1% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 9.5% of tests failed in 2021 against 13.2% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 i10 11.8% city cars avg 13.7% National avg 14.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Hyundai i10
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 5.6% 7,012
2 Visibility 5.0% 6,264
3 Tyres 4.5% 5,661
4 Lighting & signalling 3.9% 4,847
5 Suspension 0.5% 645
6 Emissions & environmental 0.5% 585
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 5.6% Visibility 5.0% Tyres 4.5% Lighting & signalling 3.9% Suspension 0.5% Emissions & environmental 0.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Hyundai i10
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Wipers4,739
2Brake pads3,159
3Washers3,018
4Brake discs2,941
5Tread depth2,656
6Stop lamp2,413

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Hyundai i10
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 24.1% 30,139
2 Tyres 22.7% 28,373
3 Other defects 5.3% 6,657
4 Visibility 3.1% 3,934
5 Suspension 1.8% 2,298
6 Emissions & environmental 1.7% 2,065

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.3% 30-60k 13.5% 60-90k 17.3% 90-120k 20.3% 120-150k 22.1% 150k+ 25.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 i10
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 53,893 8.3%
30-60k 53,699 13.5%
60-90k 14,590 17.3%
90-120k 2,388 20.3%
120-150k 316 22.1%
150k+ 71 25.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 9.5% 6 yrs 11.0% 7 yrs 12.4% 8 yrs 13.0% 9 yrs 13.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 i10
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 24,552 9.5%
2022 24,935 11.0%
2023 25,195 12.4%
2024 25,053 13.0%
2025 25,231 13.2%

What to check before buying a 2016 i10

On a 2016 i10, brakes is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 5.6% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Hyundai i10s pass their MOT?

88.2% of the 124,966 2016 Hyundai i10 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 11.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Hyundai i10?

Brakes, recorded in 5.6% of tests, followed by visibility (5.0%).

Does the 2016 i10 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.3% in the 0-30k band to 25.4% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 124,966 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data