2004 Ford Mustang — MOT failures & pass rate

367 MOT tests on the 2004 Ford Mustang are in this dataset, and 82.3% of them passed. Against coupes & convertibles of a similar age (22.4% fail rate), the 2004 Mustang comes out 4.7pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

82%
Pass rate
367
MOT tests analysed
17.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
18.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (9.8%) and brakes (9.8%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), service brake performance and side repeaters — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 27 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 14.0% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 32.4% once past 120-150k — 2.3× the risk.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 19.1% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2004 Mustang 17.7% coupes & convertibles avg 22.4% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2004 Ford Mustang
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 9.8% 36
2 Brakes 9.8% 36
3 Suspension 4.4% 16
4 Emissions & environmental 3.0% 11
5 Steering 2.7% 10
6 Visibility 2.5% 9
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 9.8% Brakes 9.8% Suspension 4.4% Emissions & environmental 3.0% Steering 2.7% Visibility 2.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2004 Ford Mustang
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)27
2Service brake performance20
3Side repeaters13
4Headlamp aim12
5Rear fog lamp11
6Registration plates10

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2004 Ford Mustang
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 19.1% 70
2 Suspension 14.7% 54
3 Tyres 10.6% 39
4 Other defects 9.5% 35
5 Lighting & signalling 9.3% 34
6 Emissions & environmental 6.0% 22

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 14.0% 30-60k 14.0% 60-90k 14.8% 90-120k 23.4% 120-150k 32.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2004 Mustang
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 43 14.0%
30-60k 150 14.0%
60-90k 81 14.8%
90-120k 47 23.4%
120-150k 37 32.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 17 yrs 18.3% 18 yrs 17.7% 19 yrs 14.5% 20 yrs 19.1% 21 yrs 19.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2004 Mustang
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 82 18.3%
2022 79 17.7%
2023 76 14.5%
2024 63 19.1%
2025 67 19.4%

What to check before buying a 2004 Mustang

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 9.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2004 Ford Mustangs pass their MOT?

82.3% of the 367 2004 Ford Mustang MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 17.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2004 Ford Mustang?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 9.8% of tests, followed by brakes (9.8%).

Does the 2004 Mustang get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 14.0% in the 0-30k band to 32.4% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 367 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data