2003 Ford Mustang — MOT failures & pass rate

292 MOT tests on the 2003 Ford Mustang are in this dataset, and 86.3% of them passed. Coupes & convertibles of a similar age fail 22.6% of the time, so this is 8.9pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in brakes, lighting & signalling and suspension.

86%
Pass rate
292
MOT tests analysed
13.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
19.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Brakes dominates the failure mix at 10.6% of all tests — 3.8 points clear of lighting & signalling, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), headlamp aim and service brake performance — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 19 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 6.3% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 19.2% once past 90-120k — 3.1× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 17.5% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2003 Mustang 13.7% coupes & convertibles avg 22.6% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2003 Ford Mustang
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 10.6% 31
2 Lighting & signalling 6.9% 20
3 Suspension 2.4% 7
4 Tyres 1.4% 4
5 Visibility 1.4% 4
6 Emissions & environmental 1.4% 4
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 10.6% Lighting & signalling 6.9% Suspension 2.4% Tyres 1.4% Visibility 1.4% Emissions & environmental 1.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2003 Ford Mustang
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)19
2Headlamp aim18
3Service brake performance14
4Ball joint dust cover6
5Catalyst emissions4
6Position lamp4

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2003 Ford Mustang
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 17.5% 51
2 Emissions & environmental 15.4% 45
3 Suspension 14.4% 42
4 Tyres 12.7% 37
5 Other defects 8.6% 25
6 Lighting & signalling 8.2% 24

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.3% 30-60k 12.0% 60-90k 15.2% 90-120k 19.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2003 Mustang
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 48 6.3%
30-60k 83 12.0%
60-90k 79 15.2%
90-120k 52 19.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 18 yrs 14.5% 19 yrs 13.9% 20 yrs 10.7% 21 yrs 14.8% 22 yrs 14.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2003 Mustang
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 62 14.5%
2022 65 13.9%
2023 56 10.7%
2024 54 14.8%
2025 55 14.5%

What to check before buying a 2003 Mustang

On a 2003 Mustang, brakes is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 10.6% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2003 Ford Mustangs pass their MOT?

86.3% of the 292 2003 Ford Mustang MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 13.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2003 Ford Mustang?

Brakes, recorded in 10.6% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (6.9%).

Does the 2003 Mustang get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.3% in the 0-30k band to 19.2% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 292 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data