2016 BMW X5 — MOT failures & pass rate

35,602 MOT tests on the 2016 BMW X5 are in this dataset, and 90.1% of them passed. That is 2.5 percentage points better than large SUVs of a similar age, which fail at 12.4%. Failures cluster in tyres, visibility and lighting & signalling.

90%
Pass rate
35,602
MOT tests analysed
9.9%
Fail rate
better than
vs large SUVs of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: tyres, recorded in 5.8% of tests against 2.0% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are tread depth, wipers and headlamp aim — tread depth alone was recorded 667 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 6.3% in the 0-30k band and 11.9% in the 150k+ band, a 5.6-point spread.

The diesel cars hold up better: 9.7% fail against 11.2% for hybrid, a 1.5-point gap across 34,637 tests.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 21.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 X5 9.9% large SUVs avg 12.4% National avg 14.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 BMW X5
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 5.8% 2,078
2 Visibility 2.0% 706
3 Lighting & signalling 1.5% 549
4 Brakes 1.5% 525
5 Suspension 1.1% 399
6 Emissions & environmental 0.6% 198
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 5.8% Visibility 2.0% Lighting & signalling 1.5% Brakes 1.5% Suspension 1.1% Emissions & environmental 0.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 BMW X5
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Tread depth667
2Wipers640
3Headlamp aim346
4Brake pads317
5Registration plates278
6Attachment230

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 BMW X5
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 21.7% 7,716
2 Brakes 9.4% 3,344
3 Other defects 7.9% 2,799
4 Suspension 5.3% 1,899
5 Visibility 3.7% 1,315
6 Emissions & environmental 2.6% 912

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.3% 30-60k 9.1% 60-90k 10.4% 90-120k 11.6% 120-150k 12.6% 150k+ 11.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 X5
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 2,226 6.3%
30-60k 13,549 9.1%
60-90k 13,014 10.4%
90-120k 5,011 11.6%
120-150k 1,278 12.6%
150k+ 514 11.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 9.8% 6 yrs 9.6% 7 yrs 9.7% 8 yrs 10.2% 9 yrs 10.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2016 X5
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 30,854 9.7%
Hybrid 3,783 11.2%
Petrol 965 10.2%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 X5
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 7,467 9.8%
2022 7,190 9.6%
2023 7,101 9.7%
2024 6,976 10.2%
2025 6,868 10.3%

What to check before buying a 2016 X5

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: tyres accounted for 5.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 BMW X5s pass their MOT?

90.1% of the 35,602 2016 BMW X5 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 9.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 BMW X5?

Tyres, recorded in 5.8% of tests, followed by visibility (2.0%).

Does the 2016 X5 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.3% in the 0-30k band to 11.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 35,602 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data