2015 BMW X5 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 38,798 MOT tests, the 2015 BMW X5 recorded an 89.0% pass rate. Against large SUVs of a similar age (13.7% fail rate), the 2015 X5 comes out 2.7pp better. Failures cluster in tyres, visibility and suspension.

89%
Pass rate
38,798
MOT tests analysed
11.0%
Fail rate
better than
vs large SUVs of similar age
8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Tyres dominates the failure mix at 6.3% of all tests — 4.3 points clear of visibility, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are tread depth, wipers and ball joint — tread depth alone was recorded 952 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 14.7% versus 7.5%.

Fuel type barely separates them — hybrid fails 10.3% of the time against 11.4% for petrol.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 22.6% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2015 X5 11.0% large SUVs avg 13.7% National avg 16.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2015 BMW X5
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 6.3% 2,433
2 Visibility 2.0% 780
3 Suspension 1.9% 726
4 Lighting & signalling 1.7% 676
5 Brakes 1.7% 646
6 Emissions & environmental 0.6% 238
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 6.3% Visibility 2.0% Suspension 1.9% Lighting & signalling 1.7% Brakes 1.7% Emissions & environmental 0.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2015 BMW X5
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Tread depth952
2Wipers655
3Ball joint390
4Brake pads387
5Headlamp aim375
6Registration plates346

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2015 BMW X5
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 22.6% 8,783
2 Brakes 10.4% 4,045
3 Other defects 8.2% 3,182
4 Suspension 7.2% 2,808
5 Visibility 3.8% 1,487
6 Emissions & environmental 2.6% 1,025

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 7.5% 30-60k 9.9% 60-90k 11.0% 90-120k 12.1% 120-150k 12.1% 150k+ 14.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2015 X5
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 1,064 7.5%
30-60k 10,556 9.9%
60-90k 15,915 11.0%
90-120k 8,071 12.1%
120-150k 2,349 12.1%
150k+ 831 14.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 6 yrs 10.9% 7 yrs 11.1% 8 yrs 10.3% 9 yrs 10.8% 10 yrs 11.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2015 X5
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 37,379 11.0%
Hybrid 746 10.3%
Petrol 673 11.4%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2015 X5
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 8,111 10.9%
2022 7,889 11.1%
2023 7,675 10.3%
2024 7,593 10.8%
2025 7,530 11.8%

What to check before buying a 2015 X5

On a 2015 X5, tyres is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 6.3% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2015 BMW X5s pass their MOT?

89.0% of the 38,798 2015 BMW X5 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 11.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2015 BMW X5?

Tyres, recorded in 6.3% of tests, followed by visibility (2.0%).

Does the 2015 X5 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 7.5% in the 0-30k band to 14.7% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 38,798 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data