BMW 316d — MOT pass rate & failures

The BMW 316d recorded a 84.2% MOT pass rate across 28,883 tests in this dataset (model years 1982–2021), with lighting & signalling, tyres and brakes its most common failure areas. Its 15.8% fail rate is lower than the 17.4% average across all BMW 3 Series versions.

84%
Pass rate
28,883
MOT tests analysed
15.8%
Fail rate
in line with
vs executive cars of similar age
1982–2021
Model years

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) BMW 316d 15.8% All 3 Series versions 17.4% executive cars avg 15.3% National avg 17.6%
Fail rate for the 316d against the whole 3 Series range, its segment and the national average for cars of a similar age.

By model year

BMW 316d MOT results by model year
Year Tests Pass rate Fail rate
2009 859 74.7% 25.3%
2010 2,008 79.1% 20.9%
2011 1,495 79.9% 20.1%
2012 2,810 79.6% 20.4%
2013 3,328 82.9% 17.1%
2014 5,456 83.5% 16.6%
2015 3,331 85.6% 14.4%
2016 2,946 86.5% 13.5%
2017 4,349 89.1% 10.9%
2018 2,022 89.9% 10.1%
2019 190 91.0% 8.9%

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — BMW 316d
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 10.0% 2,882
2 Tyres 5.9% 1,716
3 Brakes 4.7% 1,360
4 Suspension 3.5% 1,023
5 Visibility 3.1% 898
6 Emissions & environmental 1.3% 361
7 Road wheels 0.9% 266
8 Body, structure & corrosion 0.8% 235
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 10.0% Tyres 5.9% Brakes 4.7% Suspension 3.5% Visibility 3.1% Emissions & environmental 1.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category, across all model years.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — BMW 316d
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Tread depth1,392
2Headlamp aim1,183
3Position lamp1,116
4Brake pads802
5Headlamp741
6Washers673

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — BMW 316d
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 26.0% 7,517
2 Brakes 20.4% 5,887
3 Suspension 12.1% 3,496
4 Other defects 11.8% 3,418
5 Visibility 4.6% 1,335
6 Emissions & environmental 4.5% 1,303

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.7% 30-60k 10.8% 60-90k 13.9% 90-120k 17.8% 120-150k 19.3% 150k+ 18.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — BMW 316d
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 676 8.7%
30-60k 4,487 10.8%
60-90k 7,757 13.9%
90-120k 7,609 17.8%
120-150k 4,971 19.3%
150k+ 3,372 18.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 3 yrs 10.6% 4 yrs 9.8% 5 yrs 10.1% 6 yrs 11.3% 7 yrs 13.3% 8 yrs 15.0% 9 yrs 17.3% 10 yrs 17.8% 11 yrs 18.3% 12 yrs 20.8% 13 yrs 21.1% 14 yrs 21.7% 15 yrs 25.7% 16 yrs 21.1%
How the 316d's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — BMW 316d
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 6,239 14.7%
2022 6,090 15.5%
2023 5,828 16.4%
2024 5,545 16.4%
2025 5,181 16.4%

What to check before buying a BMW 316d

Focus on the areas it most often fails on — and remember MOT data covers testable defects only, not engine or gearbox health.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How reliable is the BMW 316d at MOT time?

84.2% of the 28,883 BMW 316d MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.8% fail rate, better than the 17.4% average across all 3 Series versions.

What is the most common MOT failure on a BMW 316d?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 10.0% of tests, followed by tyres (5.9%).

Does the 316d get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.7% in the 0-30k band to 18.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 28,883 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-06. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data