2010 Audi S5 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 1,645 MOT tests, the 2010 Audi S5 recorded an 84.3% pass rate. Executive cars of a similar age fail 20.8% of the time, so this is 5.1pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in tyres, suspension and lighting & signalling.

84%
Pass rate
1,645
MOT tests analysed
15.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs executive cars of similar age
12.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — tyres (6.2%) and suspension (5.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, malfunction indicator lamp and coil spring — headlamp aim alone was recorded 59 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 20.4% versus 13.9%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 22.6% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 14.6% of tests failed in 2021 against 16.7% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 S5 15.7% executive cars avg 20.8% National avg 24.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Audi S5
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 6.2% 102
2 Suspension 5.5% 91
3 Lighting & signalling 4.7% 77
4 Emissions & environmental 4.1% 67
5 Brakes 2.3% 38
6 Visibility 1.8% 29
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 6.2% Suspension 5.5% Lighting & signalling 4.7% Emissions & environmental 4.1% Brakes 2.3% Visibility 1.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Audi S5
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim59
2Malfunction indicator lamp45
3Coil spring43
4Pins and bushes36
5Catalyst emissions30
6Brake pads29

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Audi S5
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 22.6% 372
2 Tyres 22.3% 367
3 Brakes 15.6% 256
4 Emissions & environmental 9.2% 151
5 Other defects 5.2% 86
6 Body, structure & corrosion 4.3% 71

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 13.9% 60-90k 14.3% 90-120k 16.7% 120-150k 18.2% 150k+ 20.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 S5
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 209 13.9%
60-90k 600 14.3%
90-120k 574 16.7%
120-150k 203 18.2%
150k+ 49 20.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 14.6% 12 yrs 16.1% 13 yrs 13.1% 14 yrs 18.0% 15 yrs 16.7%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 S5
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 342 14.6%
2022 342 16.1%
2023 328 13.1%
2024 328 18.0%
2025 305 16.7%

What to check before buying a 2010 S5

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: tyres accounted for 6.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Audi S5s pass their MOT?

84.3% of the 1,645 2010 Audi S5 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Audi S5?

Tyres, recorded in 6.2% of tests, followed by suspension (5.5%).

Does the 2010 S5 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 13.9% in the 30-60k band to 20.4% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,645 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data