2009 Audi S5 — MOT failures & pass rate

948 MOT tests on the 2009 Audi S5 are in this dataset, and 82.8% of them passed. Executive cars of a similar age fail 21.7% of the time, so this is 4.5pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in tyres, suspension and lighting & signalling.

83%
Pass rate
948
MOT tests analysed
17.2%
Fail rate
better than
vs executive cars of similar age
13.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — tyres (6.1%) and suspension (5.9%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are coil spring, headlamp aim and malfunction indicator lamp — coil spring alone was recorded 40 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 8.5% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 22.6% once past 150k — 2.7× the risk.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 22.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 17.1% in 2021 to 15.5% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 S5 17.2% executive cars avg 21.7% National avg 25.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Audi S5
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 6.1% 58
2 Suspension 5.9% 56
3 Lighting & signalling 5.6% 53
4 Emissions & environmental 5.0% 47
5 Brakes 2.2% 21
6 Visibility 2.1% 20
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 6.1% Suspension 5.9% Lighting & signalling 5.6% Emissions & environmental 5.0% Brakes 2.2% Visibility 2.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Audi S5
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Coil spring40
2Headlamp aim35
3Malfunction indicator lamp30
4Tread depth25
5Catalyst emissions22
6Pins and bushes18

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Audi S5
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 22.9% 217
2 Tyres 21.8% 207
3 Brakes 14.8% 140
4 Emissions & environmental 9.9% 94
5 Body, structure & corrosion 7.1% 67
6 Other defects 5.9% 56

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 8.5% 60-90k 14.5% 90-120k 19.1% 120-150k 22.9% 150k+ 22.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 S5
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 71 8.5%
60-90k 352 14.5%
90-120k 376 19.1%
120-150k 118 22.9%
150k+ 31 22.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 17.1% 13 yrs 19.1% 14 yrs 17.1% 15 yrs 16.7% 16 yrs 15.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 S5
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 211 17.1%
2022 215 19.1%
2023 187 17.1%
2024 180 16.7%
2025 155 15.5%

What to check before buying a 2009 S5

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: tyres accounted for 6.1% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Audi S5s pass their MOT?

82.8% of the 948 2009 Audi S5 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 17.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Audi S5?

Tyres, recorded in 6.1% of tests, followed by suspension (5.9%).

Does the 2009 S5 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.5% in the 30-60k band to 22.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 948 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data