2009 Audi A8 — MOT failures & pass rate

2,357 MOT tests on the 2009 Audi A8 are in this dataset, and 87.0% of them passed. Executive cars of a similar age fail 21.7% of the time, so this is 8.7pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, tyres and visibility.

87%
Pass rate
2,357
MOT tests analysed
13.0%
Fail rate
better than
vs executive cars of similar age
13.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (6.2%) and tyres (4.8%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are washers, position lamp and headlamp — washers alone was recorded 63 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 17.9% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 12.4% once past 150k.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 20.8% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 A8 13.0% executive cars avg 21.7% National avg 25.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Audi A8
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 6.2% 145
2 Tyres 4.8% 114
3 Visibility 4.0% 93
4 Suspension 3.5% 83
5 Brakes 2.8% 66
6 Emissions & environmental 1.9% 44
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 6.2% Tyres 4.8% Visibility 4.0% Suspension 3.5% Brakes 2.8% Emissions & environmental 1.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Audi A8
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Washers63
2Position lamp53
3Headlamp52
4Tread depth51
5Pins and bushes49
6Linkage pins and bushes42

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Audi A8
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 20.8% 490
2 Suspension 18.3% 431
3 Brakes 17.3% 409
4 Other defects 6.3% 148
5 Lighting & signalling 6.2% 146
6 Emissions & environmental 5.6% 131

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 17.9% 60-90k 10.9% 90-120k 15.6% 120-150k 12.2% 150k+ 12.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 A8
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 84 17.9%
60-90k 275 10.9%
90-120k 508 15.6%
120-150k 631 12.2%
150k+ 849 12.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 13.3% 13 yrs 13.0% 14 yrs 12.9% 15 yrs 12.7% 16 yrs 13.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2009 A8
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 2,103 13.0%
Petrol 254 12.6%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 A8
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 536 13.3%
2022 531 13.0%
2023 481 12.9%
2024 432 12.7%
2025 377 13.0%

What to check before buying a 2009 A8

On a 2009 A8, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 6.2% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Audi A8s pass their MOT?

87.0% of the 2,357 2009 Audi A8 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 13.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Audi A8?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 6.2% of tests, followed by tyres (4.8%).

Does the 2009 A8 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 17.9% in the 30-60k band to 12.4% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,357 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data