2016 Volvo S80 — MOT failures & pass rate

976 MOT tests on the 2016 Volvo S80 are in this dataset, and 90.2% of them passed. Against executive cars of a similar age (12.7% fail rate), the 2016 S80 comes out 2.9pp better. Failures cluster in tyres, lighting & signalling and steering.

90%
Pass rate
976
MOT tests analysed
9.8%
Fail rate
better than
vs executive cars of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — tyres (5.8%) and lighting & signalling (3.1%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, tread depth and track rod end — headlamp aim alone was recorded 25 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 4.7% in the 0-30k band and 10.6% in the 150k+ band, a 5.9-point spread — more than double.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 21.1% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 9.7% of tests failed in 2021 against 11.4% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 S80 9.8% executive cars avg 12.7% National avg 14.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Volvo S80
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 5.8% 57
2 Lighting & signalling 3.1% 30
3 Steering 1.8% 18
4 Emissions & environmental 1.6% 16
5 Visibility 1.1% 11
6 Brakes 1.1% 11
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 5.8% Lighting & signalling 3.1% Steering 1.8% Emissions & environmental 1.6% Visibility 1.1% Brakes 1.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Volvo S80
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim25
2Tread depth21
3Track rod end19
4Malfunction indicator lamp12
5Brake pads10
6Wipers7

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Volvo S80
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 21.1% 206
2 Brakes 18.9% 185
3 Other defects 6.6% 64
4 Suspension 5.0% 49
5 Lighting & signalling 4.8% 47
6 Emissions & environmental 2.9% 28

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.7% 30-60k 8.5% 60-90k 11.5% 90-120k 12.1% 120-150k 13.1% 150k+ 10.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 S80
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 106 4.7%
30-60k 342 8.5%
60-90k 252 11.5%
90-120k 149 12.1%
120-150k 61 13.1%
150k+ 66 10.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 9.7% 6 yrs 10.5% 7 yrs 9.5% 8 yrs 7.9% 9 yrs 11.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 S80
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 206 9.7%
2022 199 10.5%
2023 189 9.5%
2024 189 7.9%
2025 193 11.4%

What to check before buying a 2016 S80

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: tyres accounted for 5.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Volvo S80s pass their MOT?

90.2% of the 976 2016 Volvo S80 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 9.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Volvo S80?

Tyres, recorded in 5.8% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (3.1%).

Does the 2016 S80 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.7% in the 0-30k band to 10.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 976 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data