2000 Volvo S40 — MOT failures & pass rate

1,922 MOT tests on the 2000 Volvo S40 are in this dataset, and 72.0% of them passed. Small family cars of a similar age fail at 27.7%, so the 2000 S40 sits squarely on the average. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

72%
Pass rate
1,922
MOT tests analysed
28.0%
Fail rate
in line with
vs small family cars of similar age
22.5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 18.6% of all tests — 6.3 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, headlamp aim and headlamp — position lamp alone was recorded 181 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 25.6% in the 0-30k band and 36.4% in the 150k+ band, a 10.8-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 37.6% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2000 S40 28.0% small family cars avg 27.7% National avg 26.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2000 Volvo S40
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 18.6% 357
2 Suspension 12.2% 235
3 Brakes 11.2% 216
4 Body, structure & corrosion 6.3% 122
5 Visibility 6.2% 119
6 Steering 5.1% 99
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 18.6% Suspension 12.2% Brakes 11.2% Body, structure & corrosion 6.3% Visibility 6.2% Steering 5.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2000 Volvo S40
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp181
2Headlamp aim134
3Headlamp102
4Wipers101
5Rigid brake pipes100
6Ball joint dust cover82

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2000 Volvo S40
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 37.6% 722
2 Suspension 29.3% 563
3 Tyres 23.2% 446
4 Lighting & signalling 20.9% 402
5 Other defects 12.1% 233
6 Body, structure & corrosion 12.0% 231

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 25.6% 30-60k 21.4% 60-90k 27.6% 90-120k 28.5% 120-150k 31.3% 150k+ 36.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2000 S40
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 43 25.6%
30-60k 317 21.4%
60-90k 602 27.6%
90-120k 547 28.5%
120-150k 256 31.3%
150k+ 151 36.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 21 yrs 27.6% 22 yrs 29.9% 23 yrs 24.5% 24 yrs 31.0% 25 yrs 26.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2000 S40
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 609 27.6%
2022 499 29.9%
2023 347 24.5%
2024 268 31.0%
2025 199 26.6%

What to check before buying a 2000 S40

On a 2000 S40, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 18.6% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2000 Volvo S40s pass their MOT?

72.0% of the 1,922 2000 Volvo S40 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 28.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2000 Volvo S40?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 18.6% of tests, followed by suspension (12.2%).

Does the 2000 S40 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 25.6% in the 0-30k band to 36.4% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,922 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data