1998 Volvo S40 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 1998 Volvo S40 passed 70.1% of its 1,168 recorded MOT tests. That is 2.8 percentage points worse than small family cars of a similar age, which fail at 27.1%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

70%
Pass rate
1,168
MOT tests analysed
29.9%
Fail rate
worse than
vs small family cars of similar age
24.4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 21.8% of tests against 11.6% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, position lamp and component mounting prescribed areas — headlamp aim alone was recorded 130 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 34.9% versus 28.0%.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 38.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1998 S40 29.9% small family cars avg 27.1% National avg 25.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1998 Volvo S40
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 21.8% 254
2 Suspension 11.6% 135
3 Brakes 9.5% 111
4 Emissions & environmental 7.4% 87
5 Body, structure & corrosion 7.1% 83
6 Visibility 6.2% 72
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 21.8% Suspension 11.6% Brakes 9.5% Emissions & environmental 7.4% Body, structure & corrosion 7.1% Visibility 6.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1998 Volvo S40
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim130
2Position lamp108
3Component mounting prescribed areas95
4Catalyst emissions91
5Headlamp74
6Individual direction indicators67

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1998 Volvo S40
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 38.7% 452
2 Suspension 35.6% 416
3 Tyres 25.8% 301
4 Lighting & signalling 24.7% 288
5 Other defects 19.4% 226
6 Body, structure & corrosion 15.5% 181

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 28.0% 60-90k 29.0% 90-120k 30.0% 120-150k 31.7% 150k+ 34.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1998 S40
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 193 28.0%
60-90k 365 29.0%
90-120k 307 30.0%
120-150k 186 31.7%
150k+ 106 34.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 23 yrs 32.4% 24 yrs 28.9% 25 yrs 27.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1998 S40
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 392 32.4%
2022 291 28.9%
2023 210 27.6%
2024 142 25.4%
2025 133 33.1%

What to check before buying a 1998 S40

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 21.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1998 Volvo S40s pass their MOT?

70.1% of the 1,168 1998 Volvo S40 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 29.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1998 Volvo S40?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 21.8% of tests, followed by suspension (11.6%).

Does the 1998 S40 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 28.0% in the 30-60k band to 34.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,168 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data