2000 TVR Tuscan — MOT failures & pass rate

859 MOT tests on the 2000 TVR Tuscan are in this dataset, and 91.7% of them passed. All cars of a similar age fail 26.6% of the time, so this is 18.3pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, emissions & environmental and visibility.

92%
Pass rate
859
MOT tests analysed
8.3%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
22.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (5.8%) and emissions & environmental (3.4%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, washers and headlamp aim — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 40 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2000 Tuscan fails 11.4% of the time in the 0-30k band and 10.5% at 60-90k, a spread of only 0.9 points.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 9.5% in 2021 to 6.9% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2000 Tuscan 8.3% cars avg 23.6% National avg 26.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2000 TVR Tuscan
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 5.8% 50
2 Emissions & environmental 3.4% 29
3 Visibility 2.6% 22
4 Brakes 1.8% 15
5 Body, structure & corrosion 1.5% 13
6 Steering 1.2% 10
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 5.8% Emissions & environmental 3.4% Visibility 2.6% Brakes 1.8% Body, structure & corrosion 1.5% Steering 1.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2000 TVR Tuscan
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions40
2Washers21
3Headlamp aim19
4Headlamp13
5Individual direction indicators12
6Registration plates11

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2000 TVR Tuscan
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 6.6% 57
2 Emissions & environmental 5.5% 47
3 Brakes 4.5% 39
4 Suspension 3.8% 33
5 Lighting & signalling 2.8% 24
6 Body, structure & corrosion 2.3% 20

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 11.4% 30-60k 5.9% 60-90k 10.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2000 Tuscan
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 193 11.4%
30-60k 526 5.9%
60-90k 105 10.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 21 yrs 9.5% 22 yrs 8.5% 23 yrs 9.7% 24 yrs 6.3% 25 yrs 6.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2000 Tuscan
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 189 9.5%
2022 177 8.5%
2023 176 9.7%
2024 158 6.3%
2025 159 6.9%

What to check before buying a 2000 Tuscan

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 5.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2000 TVR Tuscans pass their MOT?

91.7% of the 859 2000 TVR Tuscan MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 8.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2000 TVR Tuscan?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 5.8% of tests, followed by emissions & environmental (3.4%).

Does the 2000 Tuscan get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 11.4% in the 0-30k band to 10.5% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 859 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data