2011 Toyota Vitz — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 1,158 MOT tests, the 2011 Toyota Vitz recorded an 86.9% pass rate. Against all cars of a similar age (24.2% fail rate), the 2011 Vitz comes out 11.1pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and visibility.

87%
Pass rate
1,158
MOT tests analysed
13.1%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
12.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 10.4% of all tests — 4.9 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are rear fog lamp, linkage ball joint dust cover and ball joint dust cover — rear fog lamp alone was recorded 69 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 11.7% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 20.0% once past 90-120k.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 17.6% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 2.9% of tests failed in 2021 against 17.6% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2011 Vitz 13.1% cars avg 20.7% National avg 24.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2011 Toyota Vitz
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 10.4% 120
2 Suspension 5.4% 63
3 Visibility 3.0% 35
4 Tyres 2.8% 32
5 Brakes 2.7% 31
6 Body, structure & corrosion 0.6% 7
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 10.4% Suspension 5.4% Visibility 3.0% Tyres 2.8% Brakes 2.7% Body, structure & corrosion 0.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2011 Toyota Vitz
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rear fog lamp69
2Linkage ball joint dust cover44
3Ball joint dust cover32
4Headlamp aim30
5Position lamp25
6Wipers24

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2011 Toyota Vitz
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 17.6% 204
2 Suspension 11.1% 128
3 Lighting & signalling 9.0% 104
4 Brakes 8.2% 95
5 Other defects 4.1% 47
6 Visibility 2.5% 29

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 11.7% 30-60k 11.9% 60-90k 14.6% 90-120k 20.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2011 Vitz
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 163 11.7%
30-60k 569 11.9%
60-90k 370 14.6%
90-120k 50 20.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 10 yrs 2.9% 11 yrs 5.8% 12 yrs 9.2% 13 yrs 15.3% 14 yrs 17.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2011 Vitz
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 34 2.9%
2022 154 5.8%
2023 249 9.2%
2024 347 15.3%
2025 374 17.6%

What to check before buying a 2011 Vitz

On a 2011 Vitz, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 10.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2011 Toyota Vitzs pass their MOT?

86.9% of the 1,158 2011 Toyota Vitz MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 13.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2011 Toyota Vitz?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 10.4% of tests, followed by suspension (5.4%).

Does the 2011 Vitz get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 11.7% in the 0-30k band to 20.0% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,158 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data