2008 Toyota Verso — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 516 MOT tests, the 2008 Toyota Verso recorded a 79.3% pass rate. That is 7.6 percentage points better than MPVs of a similar age, which fail at 28.3%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and tyres.

79%
Pass rate
516
MOT tests analysed
20.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs MPVs of similar age
14.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 15.1% of all tests — 6.6 points clear of brakes, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, stop lamp and wipers — position lamp alone was recorded 39 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 15.1% in the 60-90k band and 25.2% in the 150k+ band, a 10.1-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 34.7% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 Verso 20.7% MPVs avg 28.3% National avg 26.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Toyota Verso
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 15.1% 78
2 Brakes 8.5% 44
3 Tyres 6.2% 32
4 Emissions & environmental 5.6% 29
5 Visibility 5.4% 28
6 Suspension 4.7% 24
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 15.1% Brakes 8.5% Tyres 6.2% Emissions & environmental 5.6% Visibility 5.4% Suspension 4.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Toyota Verso
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp39
2Stop lamp25
3Wipers22
4Headlamp aim21
5Rigid brake pipes19
6Registration plate lamp(s)17

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Toyota Verso
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 34.7% 179
2 Tyres 28.7% 148
3 Suspension 28.7% 148
4 Lighting & signalling 15.9% 82
5 Other defects 15.5% 80
6 Body, structure & corrosion 14.5% 75

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 15.1% 90-120k 19.1% 120-150k 21.8% 150k+ 25.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 Verso
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 73 15.1%
90-120k 162 19.1%
120-150k 133 21.8%
150k+ 119 25.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 24.4% 14 yrs 18.3% 15 yrs 19.8% 16 yrs 16.0% 17 yrs 25.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2008 Verso
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 292 21.6%
Petrol 224 19.6%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 Verso
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 123 24.4%
2022 104 18.3%
2023 106 19.8%
2024 100 16.0%
2025 83 25.3%

What to check before buying a 2008 Verso

On a 2008 Verso, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 15.1% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Toyota Versos pass their MOT?

79.3% of the 516 2008 Toyota Verso MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 20.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Toyota Verso?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.1% of tests, followed by brakes (8.5%).

Does the 2008 Verso get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 15.1% in the 60-90k band to 25.2% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 516 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data