2005 Toyota Surf — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2005 Toyota Surf passed 74.9% of its 447 recorded MOT tests. All cars of a similar age fail 27.6% of the time, so this is 2.5pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

75%
Pass rate
447
MOT tests analysed
25.1%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
17.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (13.7%) and brakes (11.6%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are service brake performance, rear fog lamp and ball joint — service brake performance alone was recorded 34 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2005 Surf fails 25.6% of the time in the 90-120k band and 22.8% at 150k+, a spread of only 2.9 points.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 46.5% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 29.0% in 2021 to 21.6% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 Surf 25.1% cars avg 23.9% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Toyota Surf
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 13.7% 61
2 Brakes 11.6% 52
3 Suspension 11.2% 50
4 Body, structure & corrosion 9.4% 42
5 Steering 4.3% 19
6 Visibility 3.8% 17
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 13.7% Brakes 11.6% Suspension 11.2% Body, structure & corrosion 9.4% Steering 4.3% Visibility 3.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Toyota Surf
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Service brake performance34
2Rear fog lamp30
3Ball joint24
4Service brake imbalance21
5Joints19
6Wipers19

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Toyota Surf
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 46.5% 208
2 Tyres 21.9% 98
3 Emissions & environmental 21.5% 96
4 Brakes 19.7% 88
5 Body, structure & corrosion 19.0% 85
6 Other defects 15.0% 67

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 90-120k 25.6% 120-150k 30.7% 150k+ 22.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 Surf
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
90-120k 39 25.6%
120-150k 75 30.7%
150k+ 312 22.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 29.0% 17 yrs 27.0% 18 yrs 24.7% 19 yrs 17.2% 20 yrs 21.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 Surf
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 124 29.0%
2022 111 27.0%
2023 97 24.7%
2024 64 17.2%
2025 51 21.6%

What to check before buying a 2005 Surf

On a 2005 Surf, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 13.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Toyota Surfs pass their MOT?

74.9% of the 447 2005 Toyota Surf MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 25.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Toyota Surf?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.7% of tests, followed by brakes (11.6%).

Does the 2005 Surf get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 25.6% in the 90-120k band to 22.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 447 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data