2003 Toyota Surf — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 340 MOT tests, the 2003 Toyota Surf recorded a 78.2% pass rate. All cars of a similar age fail 27.7% of the time, so this is 5.9pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and body, structure & corrosion.

78%
Pass rate
340
MOT tests analysed
21.8%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
19.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 14.1% of all tests — 3.2 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are rear fog lamp, joints and ball joint — rear fog lamp alone was recorded 22 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2003 Surf fails 24.4% of the time in the 90-120k band and 21.7% at 150k+, a spread of only 2.8 points.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 42.1% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 22.0% in 2021 to 18.9% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2003 Surf 21.8% cars avg 24.4% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2003 Toyota Surf
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 14.1% 48
2 Suspension 10.9% 37
3 Body, structure & corrosion 7.9% 27
4 Brakes 6.8% 23
5 Visibility 2.9% 10
6 Tyres 2.9% 10
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 14.1% Suspension 10.9% Body, structure & corrosion 7.9% Brakes 6.8% Visibility 2.9% Tyres 2.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2003 Toyota Surf
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rear fog lamp22
2Joints16
3Ball joint15
4Prescribed areas14
5Component mounting prescribed areas11
6Rbt (sp)11

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2003 Toyota Surf
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 42.1% 143
2 Emissions & environmental 25.9% 88
3 Brakes 24.4% 83
4 Body, structure & corrosion 24.1% 82
5 Tyres 18.8% 64
6 Other defects 14.4% 49

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 90-120k 24.4% 120-150k 20.3% 150k+ 21.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2003 Surf
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
90-120k 45 24.4%
120-150k 74 20.3%
150k+ 203 21.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 18 yrs 22.0% 19 yrs 25.8% 20 yrs 22.2% 21 yrs 15.7% 22 yrs 18.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2003 Surf
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 91 22.0%
2022 89 25.8%
2023 72 22.2%
2024 51 15.7%
2025 37 18.9%

What to check before buying a 2003 Surf

On a 2003 Surf, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 14.1% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2003 Toyota Surfs pass their MOT?

78.2% of the 340 2003 Toyota Surf MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 21.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2003 Toyota Surf?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.1% of tests, followed by suspension (10.9%).

Does the 2003 Surf get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 24.4% in the 90-120k band to 21.7% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 340 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data