1997 Toyota Picnic — MOT failures & pass rate

525 MOT tests on the 1997 Toyota Picnic are in this dataset, and 70.5% of them passed. That is 4.3 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 25.2%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, body, structure & corrosion and emissions & environmental.

70%
Pass rate
525
MOT tests analysed
29.5%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
25.5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (14.5%) and body, structure & corrosion (13.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, catalyst emissions and joints — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 60 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 60-90k one: 34.7% versus 17.5%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 41.1% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1997 Picnic 29.5% cars avg 22.9% National avg 25.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1997 Toyota Picnic
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 14.5% 76
2 Body, structure & corrosion 13.7% 72
3 Emissions & environmental 12.0% 63
4 Suspension 8.8% 46
5 Brakes 6.5% 34
6 Tyres 6.5% 34
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 14.5% Body, structure & corrosion 13.7% Emissions & environmental 12.0% Suspension 8.8% Brakes 6.5% Tyres 6.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1997 Toyota Picnic
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas60
2Catalyst emissions59
3Joints41
4Position lamp33
5Exhaust system30
6Stop lamp27

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1997 Toyota Picnic
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 41.1% 216
2 Emissions & environmental 33.1% 174
3 Tyres 28.8% 151
4 Brakes 24.2% 127
5 Body, structure & corrosion 16.6% 87
6 Other defects 16.2% 85

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 17.5% 90-120k 25.0% 120-150k 30.3% 150k+ 34.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1997 Picnic
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 63 17.5%
90-120k 88 25.0%
120-150k 142 30.3%
150k+ 219 34.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 24 yrs 27.7% 25 yrs 29.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1997 Picnic
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 155 27.7%
2022 136 29.4%
2023 96 31.3%
2024 83 32.5%
2025 55 27.3%

What to check before buying a 1997 Picnic

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 14.5% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1997 Toyota Picnics pass their MOT?

70.5% of the 525 1997 Toyota Picnic MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 29.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1997 Toyota Picnic?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.5% of tests, followed by body, structure & corrosion (13.7%).

Does the 1997 Picnic get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 17.5% in the 60-90k band to 34.7% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 525 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data