2006 Toyota Lucida — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 372 MOT tests, the 2006 Toyota Lucida recorded a 68.0% pass rate. All cars of a similar age fail 27.1% of the time, so this is 4.9pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

68%
Pass rate
372
MOT tests analysed
32.0%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
16.3
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 25.0% of tests against 16.9% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, headlamp aim and rear fog lamp — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 45 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 90-120k one: 34.0% versus 26.1%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 40.6% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 33.3% in 2021 to 27.8% in 2024, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2006 Lucida 32.0% cars avg 23.3% National avg 27.1%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2006 Toyota Lucida
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 25.0% 93
2 Suspension 16.9% 63
3 Brakes 13.2% 49
4 Body, structure & corrosion 9.4% 35
5 Visibility 8.6% 32
6 Emissions & environmental 6.5% 24
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 25.0% Suspension 16.9% Brakes 13.2% Body, structure & corrosion 9.4% Visibility 8.6% Emissions & environmental 6.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2006 Toyota Lucida
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas45
2Headlamp aim42
3Rear fog lamp33
4Wipers30
5Headlamp29
6Exhaust system20

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2006 Toyota Lucida
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 40.6% 151
2 Brakes 32.8% 122
3 Emissions & environmental 29.6% 110
4 Lighting & signalling 26.9% 100
5 Tyres 26.6% 99
6 Other defects 19.9% 74

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 90-120k 26.1% 120-150k 32.6% 150k+ 34.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2006 Lucida
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
90-120k 46 26.1%
120-150k 92 32.6%
150k+ 212 34.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 15 yrs 33.3% 16 yrs 27.5% 17 yrs 38.2% 18 yrs 27.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2006 Lucida
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 132 33.3%
2022 102 27.5%
2023 76 38.2%
2024 36 27.8%

What to check before buying a 2006 Lucida

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 25.0% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2006 Toyota Lucidas pass their MOT?

68.0% of the 372 2006 Toyota Lucida MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 32.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2006 Toyota Lucida?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 25.0% of tests, followed by suspension (16.9%).

Does the 2006 Lucida get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 26.1% in the 90-120k band to 34.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 372 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data