1992 Toyota Land Cruiser — MOT failures & pass rate

660 MOT tests on the 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser are in this dataset, and 82.9% of them passed. Large SUVs of a similar age fail 23.6% of the time, so this is 6.5pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

83%
Pass rate
660
MOT tests analysed
17.1%
Fail rate
better than
vs large SUVs of similar age
31
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (11.2%) and brakes (9.4%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are prescribed areas, headlamp aim and service brake performance — prescribed areas alone was recorded 26 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 10.2% of 90-120k cars fail, rising to 18.6% once past 150k.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 33.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 21.8% in 2021 to 16.5% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1992 Land Cruiser 17.1% large SUVs avg 23.6% National avg 22.9%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 11.2% 74
2 Brakes 9.4% 62
3 Suspension 6.5% 43
4 Visibility 5.3% 35
5 Body, structure & corrosion 4.7% 31
6 Emissions & environmental 2.7% 18
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 11.2% Brakes 9.4% Suspension 6.5% Visibility 5.3% Body, structure & corrosion 4.7% Emissions & environmental 2.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Prescribed areas26
2Headlamp aim26
3Service brake performance23
4Wipers22
5Stop lamp20
6Washers19

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 33.0% 218
2 Brakes 24.6% 162
3 Body, structure & corrosion 17.7% 117
4 Emissions & environmental 17.0% 112
5 Other defects 11.7% 77
6 Steering 10.3% 68

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 90-120k 10.2% 120-150k 17.2% 150k+ 18.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1992 Land Cruiser
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
90-120k 59 10.2%
120-150k 116 17.2%
150k+ 445 18.6%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1992 Land Cruiser
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 147 21.8%
2022 124 16.1%
2023 116 15.5%
2024 140 15.0%
2025 133 16.5%

What to check before buying a 1992 Land Cruiser

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 11.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1992 Toyota Land Cruisers pass their MOT?

82.9% of the 660 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 17.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 11.2% of tests, followed by brakes (9.4%).

Does the 1992 Land Cruiser get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 10.2% in the 90-120k band to 18.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 660 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data