2010 Toyota Iq — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2010 Toyota Iq passed 84.8% of its 21,872 recorded MOT tests. That is 9.1 percentage points better than city cars of a similar age, which fail at 24.3%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, visibility and brakes.

85%
Pass rate
21,872
MOT tests analysed
15.2%
Fail rate
better than
vs city cars of similar age
13
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (8.5%) and visibility (5.6%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are wipers, position lamp and headlamp aim — wipers alone was recorded 949 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 23.7% versus 7.6%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 28.1% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 13.7% of tests failed in 2021 against 16.8% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Iq 15.2% city cars avg 24.3% National avg 24.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Toyota Iq
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 8.5% 1,852
2 Visibility 5.6% 1,215
3 Brakes 5.1% 1,119
4 Suspension 4.5% 994
5 Tyres 3.4% 737
6 Emissions & environmental 1.8% 393
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 8.5% Visibility 5.6% Brakes 5.1% Suspension 4.5% Tyres 3.4% Emissions & environmental 1.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Toyota Iq
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Wipers949
2Position lamp690
3Headlamp aim590
4Headlamp590
5Rigid brake pipes545
6Washers533

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Toyota Iq
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 28.1% 6,157
2 Tyres 23.3% 5,102
3 Suspension 16.0% 3,492
4 Lighting & signalling 8.3% 1,814
5 Other defects 7.0% 1,532
6 Body, structure & corrosion 5.9% 1,283

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 7.6% 30-60k 12.3% 60-90k 16.5% 90-120k 18.2% 120-150k 22.6% 150k+ 23.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Iq
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 1,836 7.6%
30-60k 6,946 12.3%
60-90k 7,574 16.5%
90-120k 3,887 18.2%
120-150k 1,254 22.6%
150k+ 367 23.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 13.7% 12 yrs 13.4% 13 yrs 15.5% 14 yrs 16.6% 15 yrs 16.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Iq
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 4,362 13.7%
2022 4,336 13.4%
2023 4,471 15.5%
2024 4,381 16.6%
2025 4,322 16.8%

What to check before buying a 2010 Iq

On a 2010 Iq, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 8.5% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Toyota Iqs pass their MOT?

84.8% of the 21,872 2010 Toyota Iq MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Toyota Iq?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 8.5% of tests, followed by visibility (5.6%).

Does the 2010 Iq get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 7.6% in the 0-30k band to 23.7% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 21,872 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data