2011 Toyota Hi=Ace — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2011 Toyota Hi=Ace passed 82.5% of its 2,447 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (23.0% fail rate), the 2011 Hi=Ace comes out 5.6pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

83%
Pass rate
2,447
MOT tests analysed
17.4%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
11.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 13.2% of all tests — 7.1 points clear of brakes, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, wipers and linkage pins and bushes — position lamp alone was recorded 118 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 21.1% versus 8.1%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 24.5% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2011 Hi=Ace 17.4% cars avg 19.6% National avg 23.0%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2011 Toyota Hi=Ace
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 13.2% 323
2 Brakes 6.1% 150
3 Suspension 6.0% 147
4 Visibility 4.6% 112
5 Emissions & environmental 4.4% 107
6 Tyres 3.2% 79
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 13.2% Brakes 6.1% Suspension 6.0% Visibility 4.6% Emissions & environmental 4.4% Tyres 3.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2011 Toyota Hi=Ace
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp118
2Wipers101
3Linkage pins and bushes94
4Stop lamp86
5Headlamp aim83
6On or after 01/07/200878

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2011 Toyota Hi=Ace
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 24.5% 599
2 Brakes 20.9% 512
3 Tyres 18.6% 454
4 Lighting & signalling 15.0% 366
5 Other defects 8.7% 213
6 Visibility 7.4% 182

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.1% 30-60k 11.4% 60-90k 16.2% 90-120k 16.2% 120-150k 17.7% 150k+ 21.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2011 Hi=Ace
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 62 8.1%
30-60k 237 11.4%
60-90k 394 16.2%
90-120k 476 16.2%
120-150k 453 17.7%
150k+ 824 21.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 10 yrs 16.6% 11 yrs 17.4% 12 yrs 18.4% 13 yrs 18.9% 14 yrs 15.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2011 Hi=Ace
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 2,318 17.2%
Petrol 129 21.7%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2011 Hi=Ace
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 537 16.6%
2022 534 17.4%
2023 499 18.4%
2024 454 18.9%
2025 423 15.8%

What to check before buying a 2011 Hi=Ace

On a 2011 Hi=Ace, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 13.2% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2011 Toyota Hi=Aces pass their MOT?

82.5% of the 2,447 2011 Toyota Hi=Ace MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 17.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2011 Toyota Hi=Ace?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.2% of tests, followed by brakes (6.1%).

Does the 2011 Hi=Ace get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.1% in the 0-30k band to 21.1% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,447 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data