1992 Suzuki Vitara — MOT failures & pass rate

266 MOT tests on the 1992 Suzuki Vitara are in this dataset, and 75.6% of them passed. Against small SUVs of a similar age (26.1% fail rate), the 1992 Vitara comes out 1.6pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, body, structure & corrosion and brakes.

76%
Pass rate
266
MOT tests analysed
24.4%
Fail rate
better than
vs small SUVs of similar age
30.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 17.7% of all tests — 6.4 points clear of body, structure & corrosion, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are prescribed areas, headlamp aim and component mounting prescribed areas — prescribed areas alone was recorded 32 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 23.5% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 16.7% once past 90-120k.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 29.3% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 23.6% of tests failed in 2021 against 27.0% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1992 Vitara 24.4% small SUVs avg 26.1% National avg 23.0%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1992 Suzuki Vitara
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 17.7% 47
2 Body, structure & corrosion 11.3% 30
3 Brakes 10.2% 27
4 Suspension 8.3% 22
5 Emissions & environmental 6.4% 17
6 Seat belts & restraints 5.6% 15
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 17.7% Body, structure & corrosion 11.3% Brakes 10.2% Suspension 8.3% Emissions & environmental 6.4% Seat belts & restraints 5.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1992 Suzuki Vitara
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Prescribed areas32
2Headlamp aim24
3Component mounting prescribed areas23
4Rigid brake pipes14
5Exhaust system13
6Service brake performance13

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1992 Suzuki Vitara
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 29.3% 78
2 Body, structure & corrosion 26.3% 70
3 Suspension 20.3% 54
4 Emissions & environmental 19.2% 51
5 Other defects 17.3% 46
6 Tyres 16.5% 44

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 23.5% 30-60k 28.2% 60-90k 24.5% 90-120k 16.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1992 Vitara
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 68 23.5%
30-60k 71 28.2%
60-90k 94 24.5%
90-120k 30 16.7%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1992 Vitara
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 72 23.6%
2022 55 23.6%
2023 50 30.0%
2024 52 19.2%
2025 37 27.0%

What to check before buying a 1992 Vitara

On a 1992 Vitara, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 17.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1992 Suzuki Vitaras pass their MOT?

75.6% of the 266 1992 Suzuki Vitara MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 24.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1992 Suzuki Vitara?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.7% of tests, followed by body, structure & corrosion (11.3%).

Does the 1992 Vitara get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 23.5% in the 0-30k band to 16.7% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 266 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data