2020 Suzuki Swift — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 25,667 MOT tests, the 2020 Suzuki Swift recorded a 94.5% pass rate. Against superminis of a similar age (8.8% fail rate), the 2020 Swift comes out 3.3pp better. Failures cluster in visibility, tyres and lighting & signalling.

94%
Pass rate
25,667
MOT tests analysed
5.5%
Fail rate
better than
vs superminis of similar age
4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — visibility (4.2%) and tyres (2.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are wipers, headlamp aim and tread depth — wipers alone was recorded 1,207 times.

A 90-120k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 13.0% versus 4.0%.

Fuel type barely separates them — petrol fails 5.2% of the time against 5.5% for hybrid.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 22.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 0.7% of tests failed in 2022 against 6.9% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2020 Swift 5.5% superminis avg 8.8% National avg 9.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2020 Suzuki Swift
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Visibility 4.2% 1,089
2 Tyres 2.5% 643
3 Lighting & signalling 2.3% 581
4 Brakes 1.1% 295
5 Seat belts & restraints 0.2% 40
6 Suspension 0.2% 40
Share of tests failing on each category Visibility 4.2% Tyres 2.5% Lighting & signalling 2.3% Brakes 1.1% Seat belts & restraints 0.2% Suspension 0.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2020 Suzuki Swift
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Wipers1,207
2Headlamp aim490
3Tread depth219
4Brake pads203
5Washers175
6Tyre pressure monitoring system120

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2020 Suzuki Swift
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 22.9% 5,866
2 Brakes 9.5% 2,435
3 Other defects 4.3% 1,104
4 Visibility 3.6% 928
5 Suspension 1.0% 247
6 Road wheels 0.5% 130

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.0% 30-60k 8.7% 60-90k 10.9% 90-120k 13.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2020 Swift
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 17,687 4.0%
30-60k 7,160 8.7%
60-90k 708 10.9%
90-120k 77 13.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 2 yrs 0.7% 3 yrs 4.0% 4 yrs 5.8% 5 yrs 6.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2020 Swift
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Hybrid 22,406 5.5%
Petrol 3,261 5.2%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2020 Swift
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2022 300 0.7%
2023 8,486 4.0%
2024 8,352 5.8%
2025 8,514 6.9%

What to check before buying a 2020 Swift

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: visibility accounted for 4.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2020 Suzuki Swifts pass their MOT?

94.5% of the 25,667 2020 Suzuki Swift MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 5.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2020 Suzuki Swift?

Visibility, recorded in 4.2% of tests, followed by tyres (2.5%).

Does the 2020 Swift get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.0% in the 0-30k band to 13.0% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 25,667 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data