2020 Suzuki Ignis — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 12,522 MOT tests, the 2020 Suzuki Ignis recorded a 95.3% pass rate. Against city cars of a similar age (7.6% fail rate), the 2020 Ignis comes out 3.0pp better. Failures cluster in visibility, tyres and lighting & signalling.

95%
Pass rate
12,522
MOT tests analysed
4.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs city cars of similar age
4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — visibility (4.4%) and tyres (2.4%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are wipers, tread depth and headlamp aim — wipers alone was recorded 613 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2020 Ignis fails 4.0% of the time in the 0-30k band and 6.3% at 60-90k, a spread of only 2.3 points.

Fuel type barely separates them — hybrid fails 4.7% of the time against 4.7% for petrol.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 22.3% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2020 Ignis 4.7% city cars avg 7.6% National avg 9.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2020 Suzuki Ignis
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Visibility 4.4% 546
2 Tyres 2.4% 297
3 Lighting & signalling 1.3% 166
4 Brakes 0.5% 57
5 Seat belts & restraints 0.3% 35
6 Suspension 0.1% 19
Share of tests failing on each category Visibility 4.4% Tyres 2.4% Lighting & signalling 1.3% Brakes 0.5% Seat belts & restraints 0.3% Suspension 0.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2020 Suzuki Ignis
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Wipers613
2Tread depth168
3Headlamp aim152
4Washers86
5Tyre pressure monitoring system44
6Brake pads26

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2020 Suzuki Ignis
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 22.3% 2,790
2 Brakes 4.1% 511
3 Other defects 3.8% 474
4 Visibility 2.8% 352
5 Suspension 1.4% 171
6 Emissions & environmental 0.5% 62

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.0% 30-60k 7.2% 60-90k 6.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2020 Ignis
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 9,960 4.0%
30-60k 2,413 7.2%
60-90k 126 6.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 2 yrs 5.6% 3 yrs 3.9% 4 yrs 5.0% 5 yrs 5.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2020 Ignis
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Hybrid 11,343 4.7%
Petrol 1,179 4.7%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2020 Ignis
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2022 107 5.6%
2023 4,188 3.9%
2024 4,109 5.0%
2025 4,115 5.0%

What to check before buying a 2020 Ignis

On a 2020 Ignis, visibility is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 4.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2020 Suzuki Igniss pass their MOT?

95.3% of the 12,522 2020 Suzuki Ignis MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 4.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2020 Suzuki Ignis?

Visibility, recorded in 4.4% of tests, followed by tyres (2.4%).

Does the 2020 Ignis get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.0% in the 0-30k band to 6.3% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 12,522 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data