2016 Suzuki Ignis — MOT failures & pass rate

1,484 MOT tests on the 2016 Suzuki Ignis are in this dataset, and 85.4% of them passed. That is effectively the same as city cars of a similar age (13.7% fail rate), so the MOT record here is unremarkable in either direction. Failures cluster in suspension, tyres and visibility.

85%
Pass rate
1,484
MOT tests analysed
14.6%
Fail rate
in line with
vs city cars of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: suspension, recorded in 9.0% of tests against 3.9% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are coil spring, tread depth and wipers — coil spring alone was recorded 108 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 8.8% in the 0-30k band and 22.0% in the 60-90k band, a 13.2-point spread — more than double.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 26.2% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 11.1% of tests failed in 2021 against 15.2% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 Ignis 14.6% city cars avg 13.7% National avg 14.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Suzuki Ignis
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 9.0% 134
2 Tyres 3.9% 58
3 Visibility 3.4% 50
4 Lighting & signalling 3.0% 44
5 Brakes 1.9% 29
6 Emissions & environmental 0.4% 6
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 9.0% Tyres 3.9% Visibility 3.4% Lighting & signalling 3.0% Brakes 1.9% Emissions & environmental 0.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Suzuki Ignis
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Coil spring108
2Tread depth51
3Wipers46
4Pins and bushes35
5Headlamp aim21
6Position lamp16

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Suzuki Ignis
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 26.2% 388
2 Suspension 16.9% 251
3 Brakes 12.8% 190
4 Other defects 6.3% 93
5 Visibility 2.0% 30
6 Steering 1.8% 26

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.8% 30-60k 17.0% 60-90k 22.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 Ignis
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 558 8.8%
30-60k 731 17.0%
60-90k 168 22.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 11.1% 6 yrs 15.4% 7 yrs 16.4% 8 yrs 14.7% 9 yrs 15.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2016 Ignis
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 1,243 14.6%
Hybrid 241 14.9%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 Ignis
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 279 11.1%
2022 298 15.4%
2023 299 16.4%
2024 306 14.7%
2025 302 15.2%

What to check before buying a 2016 Ignis

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 9.0% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Suzuki Igniss pass their MOT?

85.4% of the 1,484 2016 Suzuki Ignis MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 14.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Suzuki Ignis?

Suspension, recorded in 9.0% of tests, followed by tyres (3.9%).

Does the 2016 Ignis get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.8% in the 0-30k band to 22.0% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,484 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data