2006 Suzuki Carry — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 419 MOT tests, the 2006 Suzuki Carry recorded a 71.1% pass rate. All cars of a similar age fail 27.4% of the time, so this is 1.5pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and emissions & environmental.

71%
Pass rate
419
MOT tests analysed
28.9%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
16.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.0% of tests against 10.5% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp, component mounting prescribed areas and stop lamp — headlamp alone was recorded 28 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 30.9% versus 24.2%.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 26.5% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 31.8% in 2021 to 28.2% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2006 Carry 28.9% cars avg 23.6% National avg 27.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2006 Suzuki Carry
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 17.0% 71
2 Suspension 10.5% 44
3 Emissions & environmental 8.3% 35
4 Brakes 8.1% 34
5 Body, structure & corrosion 7.9% 33
6 Tyres 5.7% 24
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 17.0% Suspension 10.5% Emissions & environmental 8.3% Brakes 8.1% Body, structure & corrosion 7.9% Tyres 5.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2006 Suzuki Carry
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp28
2Component mounting prescribed areas27
3Stop lamp24
4Rigid brake pipes23
5Tread depth22
6Ball joint22

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2006 Suzuki Carry
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 26.5% 111
2 Suspension 25.1% 105
3 Tyres 19.6% 82
4 Other defects 17.0% 71
5 Body, structure & corrosion 13.6% 57
6 Lighting & signalling 8.8% 37

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 24.2% 60-90k 30.9% 90-120k 33.0% 120-150k 30.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2006 Carry
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 120 24.2%
60-90k 110 30.9%
90-120k 109 33.0%
120-150k 42 30.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 15 yrs 31.8% 16 yrs 31.3% 17 yrs 27.4% 18 yrs 25.0% 19 yrs 28.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2006 Carry
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 88 31.8%
2022 96 31.3%
2023 84 27.4%
2024 80 25.0%
2025 71 28.2%

What to check before buying a 2006 Carry

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 17.0% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2006 Suzuki Carrys pass their MOT?

71.1% of the 419 2006 Suzuki Carry MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 28.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2006 Suzuki Carry?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.0% of tests, followed by suspension (10.5%).

Does the 2006 Carry get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 24.2% in the 30-60k band to 30.9% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 419 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data