2000 Suzuki Carry — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2000 Suzuki Carry passed 69.5% of its 1,348 recorded MOT tests. All cars of a similar age fail 26.7% of the time, so this is 3.8pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in suspension, emissions & environmental and lighting & signalling.

70%
Pass rate
1,348
MOT tests analysed
30.5%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
22.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (15.3%) and emissions & environmental (14.2%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, catalyst emissions and ball joint — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 265 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 30.0% versus 24.6%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 28.3% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2000 Carry 30.5% cars avg 23.7% National avg 26.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2000 Suzuki Carry
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 15.3% 206
2 Emissions & environmental 14.2% 191
3 Lighting & signalling 11.4% 154
4 Body, structure & corrosion 7.6% 102
5 Visibility 6.0% 81
6 Brakes 5.8% 78
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 15.3% Emissions & environmental 14.2% Lighting & signalling 11.4% Body, structure & corrosion 7.6% Visibility 6.0% Brakes 5.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2000 Suzuki Carry
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas265
2Catalyst emissions254
3Ball joint90
4Chassis condition76
5Tread depth65
6Wipers64

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2000 Suzuki Carry
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 28.3% 382
2 Brakes 25.5% 344
3 Other defects 22.8% 307
4 Tyres 21.5% 290
5 Body, structure & corrosion 13.2% 178
6 Lighting & signalling 11.4% 154

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 24.6% 60-90k 28.2% 90-120k 36.6% 120-150k 36.2% 150k+ 30.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2000 Carry
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 252 24.6%
60-90k 472 28.2%
90-120k 363 36.6%
120-150k 152 36.2%
150k+ 80 30.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 21 yrs 29.9% 22 yrs 31.1% 23 yrs 29.2% 24 yrs 31.7% 25 yrs 30.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2000 Carry
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 355 29.9%
2022 315 31.1%
2023 257 29.2%
2024 227 31.7%
2025 194 30.9%

What to check before buying a 2000 Carry

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 15.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2000 Suzuki Carrys pass their MOT?

69.5% of the 1,348 2000 Suzuki Carry MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 30.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2000 Suzuki Carry?

Suspension, recorded in 15.3% of tests, followed by emissions & environmental (14.2%).

Does the 2000 Carry get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 24.6% in the 30-60k band to 30.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,348 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data