1995 Suzuki Cappuccino — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 379 MOT tests, the 1995 Suzuki Cappuccino recorded a 76.0% pass rate. That is effectively the same as all cars of a similar age (24.2% fail rate), so the MOT record here is unremarkable in either direction. Failures cluster in suspension, emissions & environmental and lighting & signalling.

76%
Pass rate
379
MOT tests analysed
24.0%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
27.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: suspension, recorded in 11.6% of tests against 8.2% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, component mounting prescribed areas and prescribed areas — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 44 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 4.8% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 32.0% once past 90-120k — 6.7× the risk.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 26.4% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 29.3% in 2021 to 18.3% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1995 Cappuccino 24.0% cars avg 22.6% National avg 24.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1995 Suzuki Cappuccino
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 11.6% 44
2 Emissions & environmental 8.2% 31
3 Lighting & signalling 7.6% 29
4 Body, structure & corrosion 6.3% 24
5 Brakes 6.3% 24
6 Visibility 2.6% 10
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 11.6% Emissions & environmental 8.2% Lighting & signalling 7.6% Body, structure & corrosion 6.3% Brakes 6.3% Visibility 2.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1995 Suzuki Cappuccino
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions44
2Component mounting prescribed areas38
3Prescribed areas18
4Integral vehicle structure condition16
5Headlamp aim15
6Chassis condition13

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1995 Suzuki Cappuccino
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 26.4% 100
2 Suspension 15.0% 57
3 Emissions & environmental 11.1% 42
4 Body, structure & corrosion 9.5% 36
5 Other defects 7.9% 30
6 Tyres 7.1% 27

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.8% 30-60k 21.8% 60-90k 27.3% 90-120k 32.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1995 Cappuccino
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 42 4.8%
30-60k 110 21.8%
60-90k 161 27.3%
90-120k 50 32.0%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1995 Cappuccino
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 92 29.3%
2022 75 26.7%
2023 71 22.5%
2024 70 21.4%
2025 71 18.3%

What to check before buying a 1995 Cappuccino

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 11.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1995 Suzuki Cappuccinos pass their MOT?

76.0% of the 379 1995 Suzuki Cappuccino MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 24.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1995 Suzuki Cappuccino?

Suspension, recorded in 11.6% of tests, followed by emissions & environmental (8.2%).

Does the 1995 Cappuccino get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.8% in the 0-30k band to 32.0% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 379 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data