Suzuki Baleno MOT pass rate & common failures

38,422 MOT tests on the Suzuki Baleno (1995–2021) give it an 84.4% pass rate. That is 2.1 percentage points worse than superminis of a similar age, which fail at 13.5%. Its most common failure areas are suspension, visibility and tyres.

84%
Pass rate
38,422
MOT tests analysed
15.6%
Fail rate
worse than
vs superminis of similar age
1995–2021
Model years covered

Best and worst Baleno years

Strongest year
2019

91.2% pass rate from 4,724 tests.

See the 2019 report
Weakest year
2016

82.5% pass rate from 11,351 tests.

See the 2016 report

Ranked across Baleno years with at least 1,000 tests. Older cars fail more simply because they are older — compare years close together in age before drawing conclusions.

What the MOT record shows

The strongest year on this record is 2019 (91.2% pass rate); the weakest is 2016 (82.5%). Older cars carry more of the difference than the average implies.

No single area dominates — suspension (7.2%) and visibility (5.2%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint dust cover, wipers and tread depth — ball joint dust cover alone was recorded 3,265 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 27.1% versus 9.7%.

The petrol cars hold up better: 15.5% fail against 17.5% for hybrid, a 2.0-point gap across 38,422 tests.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 21.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 11.1% of tests failed in 2021 against 18.8% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmark (lower is better) Suzuki Baleno 15.6% superminis avg 13.5%
Fail rate for the Suzuki Baleno against superminis of a similar age.

By model year

Every Baleno model year with a usable sample. Years with their own detailed report are linked.

Suzuki Baleno MOT results by model year
Year Tests Pass rate Fail rate Most common failure
1996 62 72.6% 27.4% Lighting & signalling
1997 147 70.8% 29.3% Body, structure & corrosion
1998 118 72.9% 27.1% Lighting & signalling
1999 166 73.5% 26.5% Brakes
2000 163 73.6% 26.4% Lighting & signalling
2001 166 72.3% 27.7% Brakes
2016 11,351 82.5% 17.5% Suspension
2017 13,164 83.2% 16.8% Suspension
2018 8,322 86.2% 13.8% Suspension
2019 4,724 91.2% 8.8% Visibility

Most common failures (all years)

Most common MOT failure areas — Suzuki Baleno
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 7.2% 2,752
2 Visibility 5.2% 2,013
3 Tyres 4.5% 1,742
4 Lighting & signalling 4.3% 1,667
5 Brakes 3.9% 1,508
6 Body, structure & corrosion 0.5% 175
7 Emissions & environmental 0.4% 146
8 Seat belts & restraints 0.3% 105
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 7.2% Visibility 5.2% Tyres 4.5% Lighting & signalling 4.3% Brakes 3.9% Body, structure & corrosion 0.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category, across all model years.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — Suzuki Baleno
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint dust cover3,265
2Wipers1,693
3Tread depth1,274
4Rigid brake pipes954
5Washers822
6Horn640
7Headlamp aim516
8Tyre pressure monitoring system460

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — Suzuki Baleno
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 21.7% 8,338
2 Tyres 21.5% 8,268
3 Suspension 17.5% 6,731
4 Other defects 6.2% 2,399
5 Visibility 3.4% 1,307
6 Lighting & signalling 1.7% 659

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 9.7% 30-60k 17.2% 60-90k 22.9% 90-120k 26.5% 120-150k 28.3% 150k+ 27.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — Suzuki Baleno
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 14,341 9.7%
30-60k 17,067 17.2%
60-90k 5,506 22.9%
90-120k 1,181 26.5%
120-150k 237 28.3%
150k+ 85 27.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 2 yrs 4.8% 3 yrs 6.7% 4 yrs 9.5% 5 yrs 13.9% 6 yrs 16.3% 7 yrs 19.4% 8 yrs 19.5% 9 yrs 19.8% 20 yrs 21.6% 21 yrs 28.7% 22 yrs 24.4% 23 yrs 25.0% 24 yrs 30.4% 25 yrs 25.0%
How the Baleno's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — Suzuki Baleno
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 37,106 15.5%
Hybrid 1,316 17.5%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — Suzuki Baleno
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 6,578 11.1%
2022 7,828 13.5%
2023 7,983 15.8%
2024 7,997 17.8%
2025 8,036 18.8%

What to check before buying a Suzuki Baleno

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Suzuki Baleno?

84.4% of the 38,422 Suzuki Baleno MOT tests in this dataset passed, a 15.6% fail rate, across model years 1995–2021.

What does the Suzuki Baleno most often fail its MOT on?

Suspension, recorded in 7.2% of tests, then visibility (5.2%).

Which Baleno years are best and worst for MOT results?

2019 has the best pass rate at 91.2% and 2016 the weakest at 82.5%, from 4,724 and 11,351 tests respectively.

How much does mileage affect Baleno MOT results?

Fail rates run at 9.7% for cars in the 0-30k band and 27.1% for 150k+, a 17.4-point difference.

Is the petrol or hybrid Baleno more reliable at MOT time?

On MOT-testable defects the petrol fails 15.5% of the time against 17.5% for the hybrid. This covers testable items only, not engine or gearbox reliability.

Methodology & source. Based on 38,422 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data