2010 Suzuki Alto — MOT failures & pass rate

28,248 MOT tests on the 2010 Suzuki Alto are in this dataset, and 78.0% of them passed. That is 2.2 percentage points better than city cars of a similar age, which fail at 24.2%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

78%
Pass rate
28,248
MOT tests analysed
22.0%
Fail rate
better than
vs city cars of similar age
12.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.2% of tests against 8.3% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are rigid brake pipes, wipers and stop lamp — rigid brake pipes alone was recorded 1,960 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 25.2% versus 13.6%.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 35.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 20.3% of tests failed in 2021 against 23.8% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Alto 22.0% city cars avg 24.2% National avg 24.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Suzuki Alto
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 15.2% 4,305
2 Brakes 8.3% 2,353
3 Suspension 8.3% 2,341
4 Visibility 6.7% 1,885
5 Tyres 5.4% 1,517
6 Body, structure & corrosion 3.0% 841
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 15.2% Brakes 8.3% Suspension 8.3% Visibility 6.7% Tyres 5.4% Body, structure & corrosion 3.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Suzuki Alto
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rigid brake pipes1,960
2Wipers1,611
3Stop lamp1,470
4Position lamp1,393
5Headlamp aim1,104
6Tread depth898

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Suzuki Alto
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 35.7% 10,074
2 Suspension 33.4% 9,421
3 Tyres 28.6% 8,074
4 Lighting & signalling 13.9% 3,930
5 Body, structure & corrosion 10.4% 2,951
6 Other defects 8.0% 2,271

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 13.6% 30-60k 19.0% 60-90k 24.2% 90-120k 27.2% 120-150k 26.1% 150k+ 25.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Alto
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 2,707 13.6%
30-60k 9,564 19.0%
60-90k 10,295 24.2%
90-120k 4,464 27.2%
120-150k 996 26.1%
150k+ 218 25.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 20.3% 12 yrs 21.1% 13 yrs 21.6% 14 yrs 23.3% 15 yrs 23.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Alto
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 5,954 20.3%
2022 5,885 21.1%
2023 5,697 21.6%
2024 5,560 23.3%
2025 5,152 23.8%

What to check before buying a 2010 Alto

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 15.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Suzuki Altos pass their MOT?

78.0% of the 28,248 2010 Suzuki Alto MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 22.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Suzuki Alto?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.2% of tests, followed by brakes (8.3%).

Does the 2010 Alto get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 13.6% in the 0-30k band to 25.2% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 28,248 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data