2009 Subaru Justy — MOT failures & pass rate

1,489 MOT tests on the 2009 Subaru Justy are in this dataset, and 78.3% of them passed. All cars of a similar age fail 25.4% of the time, so this is 3.7pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

78%
Pass rate
1,489
MOT tests analysed
21.7%
Fail rate
in line with
vs cars of similar age
13.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: suspension, recorded in 11.3% of tests against 7.7% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint, catalyst emissions and wipers — ball joint alone was recorded 126 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 35.7% versus 9.3%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 33.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 17.1% of tests failed in 2021 against 24.5% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 Justy 21.7% cars avg 21.7% National avg 25.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Subaru Justy
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 11.3% 169
2 Lighting & signalling 7.7% 115
3 Brakes 6.9% 102
4 Visibility 5.6% 83
5 Emissions & environmental 4.9% 73
6 Body, structure & corrosion 4.6% 68
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 11.3% Lighting & signalling 7.7% Brakes 6.9% Visibility 5.6% Emissions & environmental 4.9% Body, structure & corrosion 4.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Subaru Justy
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint126
2Catalyst emissions80
3Wipers76
4Rigid brake pipes52
5Joints42
6Tread depth42

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Subaru Justy
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 33.7% 502
2 Brakes 29.6% 441
3 Tyres 25.3% 376
4 Body, structure & corrosion 16.7% 249
5 Other defects 12.7% 189
6 Lighting & signalling 10.2% 152

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 9.3% 30-60k 15.4% 60-90k 24.4% 90-120k 27.8% 120-150k 35.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 Justy
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 139 9.3%
30-60k 436 15.4%
60-90k 500 24.4%
90-120k 320 27.8%
120-150k 70 35.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 17.1% 13 yrs 22.8% 14 yrs 19.0% 15 yrs 25.6% 16 yrs 24.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 Justy
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 316 17.1%
2022 329 22.8%
2023 290 19.0%
2024 289 25.6%
2025 265 24.5%

What to check before buying a 2009 Justy

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 11.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Subaru Justys pass their MOT?

78.3% of the 1,489 2009 Subaru Justy MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 21.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Subaru Justy?

Suspension, recorded in 11.3% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (7.7%).

Does the 2009 Justy get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 9.3% in the 0-30k band to 35.7% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,489 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data