2015 Subaru Forestr — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 962 MOT tests, the 2015 Subaru Forestr recorded an 82.4% pass rate. Against all cars of a similar age (16.4% fail rate), the 2015 Forestr comes out 1.2pp worse. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and tyres.

82%
Pass rate
962
MOT tests analysed
17.6%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Suspension dominates the failure mix at 11.1% of all tests — 6.4 points clear of lighting & signalling, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are pins and bushes, coil spring and ball joint — pins and bushes alone was recorded 86 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 13.0% in the 0-30k band and 23.5% in the 120-150k band, a 10.6-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 21.0% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 14.9% of tests failed in 2021 against 17.1% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2015 Forestr 17.6% cars avg 14.4% National avg 16.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2015 Subaru Forestr
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 11.1% 107
2 Lighting & signalling 4.7% 45
3 Tyres 3.0% 29
4 Brakes 2.5% 24
5 Visibility 2.2% 21
6 Emissions & environmental 1.3% 12
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 11.1% Lighting & signalling 4.7% Tyres 3.0% Brakes 2.5% Visibility 2.2% Emissions & environmental 1.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2015 Subaru Forestr
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Pins and bushes86
2Coil spring48
3Ball joint30
4Stop lamp16
5Wipers13
6Malfunction indicator lamp12

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2015 Subaru Forestr
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 21.0% 202
2 Tyres 20.7% 199
3 Brakes 17.1% 164
4 Other defects 6.9% 66
5 Emissions & environmental 2.2% 21
6 Visibility 1.9% 18

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 13.0% 30-60k 13.5% 60-90k 19.6% 90-120k 22.0% 120-150k 23.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2015 Forestr
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 54 13.0%
30-60k 326 13.5%
60-90k 363 19.6%
90-120k 173 22.0%
120-150k 34 23.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 6 yrs 14.9% 7 yrs 16.2% 8 yrs 18.4% 9 yrs 21.1% 10 yrs 17.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2015 Forestr
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 195 14.9%
2022 197 16.2%
2023 196 18.4%
2024 199 21.1%
2025 175 17.1%

What to check before buying a 2015 Forestr

On a 2015 Forestr, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 11.1% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2015 Subaru Forestrs pass their MOT?

82.4% of the 962 2015 Subaru Forestr MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 17.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2015 Subaru Forestr?

Suspension, recorded in 11.1% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (4.7%).

Does the 2015 Forestr get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 13.0% in the 0-30k band to 23.5% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 962 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data