2016 SsangYong Musso — MOT failures & pass rate

583 MOT tests on the 2016 SsangYong Musso are in this dataset, and 69.1% of them passed. That is 16.4 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 14.5%. Failures cluster in brakes, suspension and lighting & signalling.

69%
Pass rate
583
MOT tests analysed
30.9%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (17.8%) and suspension (14.9%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), coil spring and parking brake performance — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 62 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 12.8% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 38.8% once past 90-120k — 3.0× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 22.8% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 30.8% of tests failed in 2021 against 33.0% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 Musso 30.9% cars avg 13.3% National avg 14.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 SsangYong Musso
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 17.8% 104
2 Suspension 14.9% 87
3 Lighting & signalling 13.7% 80
4 Steering 6.7% 39
5 Visibility 4.1% 24
6 Tyres 3.6% 21
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 17.8% Suspension 14.9% Lighting & signalling 13.7% Steering 6.7% Visibility 4.1% Tyres 3.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 SsangYong Musso
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)62
2Coil spring50
3Parking brake performance49
4Track rod end37
5Ball joint dust cover33
6Position lamp28

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 SsangYong Musso
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 22.8% 133
2 Brakes 22.6% 132
3 Tyres 20.2% 118
4 Lighting & signalling 13.2% 77
5 Body, structure & corrosion 6.9% 40
6 Other defects 6.7% 39

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 12.8% 30-60k 30.5% 60-90k 32.7% 90-120k 38.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 Musso
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 39 12.8%
30-60k 236 30.5%
60-90k 205 32.7%
90-120k 80 38.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 30.8% 6 yrs 28.0% 7 yrs 31.7% 8 yrs 31.0% 9 yrs 33.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 Musso
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 117 30.8%
2022 118 28.0%
2023 123 31.7%
2024 113 31.0%
2025 112 33.0%

What to check before buying a 2016 Musso

On a 2016 Musso, brakes is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 17.8% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 SsangYong Mussos pass their MOT?

69.1% of the 583 2016 SsangYong Musso MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 30.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 SsangYong Musso?

Brakes, recorded in 17.8% of tests, followed by suspension (14.9%).

Does the 2016 Musso get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 12.8% in the 0-30k band to 38.8% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 583 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data