2020 SsangYong Korando — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2020 SsangYong Korando passed 85.9% of its 1,098 recorded MOT tests. Against mid-size SUVs of a similar age (8.7% fail rate), the 2020 Korando comes out 5.4pp worse. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and visibility.

86%
Pass rate
1,098
MOT tests analysed
14.1%
Fail rate
worse than
vs mid-size SUVs of similar age
3.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (7.5%) and brakes (6.0%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are registration plate lamp(s), wipers and brake pads — registration plate lamp(s) alone was recorded 43 times.

A 60-90k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 13.6% versus 8.2%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 20.9% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 10.8% of tests failed in 2023 against 17.9% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2020 Korando 14.1% mid-size SUVs avg 8.7% National avg 9.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2020 SsangYong Korando
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 7.5% 82
2 Brakes 6.0% 66
3 Visibility 4.5% 49
4 Tyres 4.0% 44
5 Emissions & environmental 2.6% 29
6 Body, structure & corrosion 0.7% 8
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 7.5% Brakes 6.0% Visibility 4.5% Tyres 4.0% Emissions & environmental 2.6% Body, structure & corrosion 0.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2020 SsangYong Korando
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Registration plate lamp(s)43
2Wipers39
3Brake pads35
4Stop lamp33
5Malfunction indicator lamp28
6Rbt (sp)26

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2020 SsangYong Korando
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 20.9% 229
2 Brakes 18.9% 208
3 Other defects 7.5% 82
4 Lighting & signalling 6.0% 66
5 Visibility 2.2% 24
6 Body, structure & corrosion 1.4% 15

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.2% 30-60k 20.3% 60-90k 13.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2020 Korando
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 574 8.2%
30-60k 424 20.3%
60-90k 44 13.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 3 yrs 10.8% 4 yrs 13.1% 5 yrs 17.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2020 Korando
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2023 343 10.8%
2024 352 13.1%
2025 368 17.9%

What to check before buying a 2020 Korando

On a 2020 Korando, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 7.5% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2020 SsangYong Korandos pass their MOT?

85.9% of the 1,098 2020 SsangYong Korando MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 14.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2020 SsangYong Korando?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 7.5% of tests, followed by brakes (6.0%).

Does the 2020 Korando get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.2% in the 0-30k band to 13.6% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,098 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data