2005 Smart Roadster — MOT failures & pass rate

1,847 MOT tests on the 2005 Smart Roadster are in this dataset, and 80.5% of them passed. That is 2.7 percentage points better than coupes & convertibles of a similar age, which fail at 22.3%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

80%
Pass rate
1,847
MOT tests analysed
19.6%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
17.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.8% of tests against 6.8% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are rigid brake pipes, individual direction indicators and position lamp — rigid brake pipes alone was recorded 75 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 12.5% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 29.4% once past 120-150k — 2.4× the risk.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 33.1% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 Roadster 19.6% coupes & convertibles avg 22.3% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Smart Roadster
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 13.8% 255
2 Brakes 6.8% 126
3 Suspension 5.7% 106
4 Visibility 3.4% 62
5 Tyres 2.6% 49
6 Body, structure & corrosion 2.2% 40
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 13.8% Brakes 6.8% Suspension 5.7% Visibility 3.4% Tyres 2.6% Body, structure & corrosion 2.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Smart Roadster
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rigid brake pipes75
2Individual direction indicators70
3Position lamp68
4Headlamp63
5Stop lamp61
6Wipers60

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Smart Roadster
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 33.1% 611
2 Suspension 27.1% 501
3 Tyres 18.3% 337
4 Lighting & signalling 12.3% 227
5 Emissions & environmental 9.8% 182
6 Road wheels 6.1% 113

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 12.5% 30-60k 19.3% 60-90k 19.3% 90-120k 18.3% 120-150k 29.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 Roadster
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 120 12.5%
30-60k 533 19.3%
60-90k 643 19.3%
90-120k 404 18.3%
120-150k 119 29.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 18.9% 17 yrs 19.7% 18 yrs 18.8% 19 yrs 20.9% 20 yrs 19.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 Roadster
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 408 18.9%
2022 391 19.7%
2023 373 18.8%
2024 354 20.9%
2025 321 19.6%

What to check before buying a 2005 Roadster

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 13.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Smart Roadsters pass their MOT?

80.5% of the 1,847 2005 Smart Roadster MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 19.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Smart Roadster?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.8% of tests, followed by brakes (6.8%).

Does the 2005 Roadster get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 12.5% in the 0-30k band to 29.4% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,847 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data