2010 Smart Fortwo Pulse — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 551 MOT tests, the 2010 Smart Fortwo Pulse recorded a 78.2% pass rate. That is 2.5 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 24.3%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

78%
Pass rate
551
MOT tests analysed
21.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
12.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 12.2% of all tests — 3.5 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are service brake performance, headlamp aim and malfunction indicator lamp — service brake performance alone was recorded 32 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 22.2% in the 30-60k band and 17.3% in the 90-120k band, a 4.9-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 23.6% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Fortwo Pulse 21.8% cars avg 20.7% National avg 24.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Smart Fortwo Pulse
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 12.2% 67
2 Suspension 8.7% 48
3 Brakes 8.2% 45
4 Emissions & environmental 5.4% 30
5 Tyres 4.2% 23
6 Visibility 3.6% 20
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 12.2% Suspension 8.7% Brakes 8.2% Emissions & environmental 5.4% Tyres 4.2% Visibility 3.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Smart Fortwo Pulse
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Service brake performance32
2Headlamp aim31
3Malfunction indicator lamp23
4Headlamp23
5Coil spring22
6Rigid brake pipes20

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Smart Fortwo Pulse
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 23.6% 130
2 Brakes 23.6% 130
3 Suspension 12.9% 71
4 Emissions & environmental 8.0% 44
5 Other defects 7.4% 41
6 Lighting & signalling 5.8% 32

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 22.2% 60-90k 23.0% 90-120k 17.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Fortwo Pulse
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 207 22.2%
60-90k 222 23.0%
90-120k 81 17.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 23.6% 12 yrs 21.7% 13 yrs 19.2% 14 yrs 20.0% 15 yrs 24.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Fortwo Pulse
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 127 23.6%
2022 120 21.7%
2023 104 19.2%
2024 100 20.0%
2025 100 24.0%

What to check before buying a 2010 Fortwo Pulse

On a 2010 Fortwo Pulse, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 12.2% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Smart Fortwo Pulses pass their MOT?

78.2% of the 551 2010 Smart Fortwo Pulse MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 21.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Smart Fortwo Pulse?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 12.2% of tests, followed by suspension (8.7%).

Does the 2010 Fortwo Pulse get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 22.2% in the 30-60k band to 17.3% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 551 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data