2003 SEAT Inca — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2003 SEAT Inca passed 66.8% of its 271 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (27.7% fail rate), the 2003 Inca comes out 5.5pp worse. Failures cluster in brakes, lighting & signalling and suspension.

67%
Pass rate
271
MOT tests analysed
33.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
19.4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (19.2%) and lighting & signalling (18.4%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are rigid brake pipes, service brake performance and headlamp aim — rigid brake pipes alone was recorded 36 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 32.4% of 60-90k cars fail, rising to 44.6% once past 150k.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 35.8% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 37.2% in 2021 to 30.8% in 2024, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2003 Inca 33.2% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2003 SEAT Inca
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 19.2% 52
2 Lighting & signalling 18.4% 50
3 Suspension 14.8% 40
4 Body, structure & corrosion 11.4% 31
5 Steering 9.6% 26
6 Visibility 7.4% 20
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 19.2% Lighting & signalling 18.4% Suspension 14.8% Body, structure & corrosion 11.4% Steering 9.6% Visibility 7.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2003 SEAT Inca
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rigid brake pipes36
2Service brake performance30
3Headlamp aim25
4Service brake imbalance25
5Position lamp20
6Steering rack19

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2003 SEAT Inca
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 35.8% 97
2 Suspension 29.9% 81
3 Tyres 29.5% 80
4 Body, structure & corrosion 25.8% 70
5 Other defects 21.8% 59
6 Visibility 18.8% 51

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 32.4% 90-120k 26.3% 120-150k 37.2% 150k+ 44.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2003 Inca
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 34 32.4%
90-120k 76 26.3%
120-150k 86 37.2%
150k+ 56 44.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 18 yrs 37.2% 19 yrs 30.6% 20 yrs 31.9% 21 yrs 30.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2003 Inca
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 94 37.2%
2022 62 30.6%
2023 47 31.9%
2024 39 30.8%

What to check before buying a 2003 Inca

On a 2003 Inca, brakes is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 19.2% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2003 SEAT Incas pass their MOT?

66.8% of the 271 2003 SEAT Inca MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 33.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2003 SEAT Inca?

Brakes, recorded in 19.2% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (18.4%).

Does the 2003 Inca get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 32.4% in the 60-90k band to 44.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 271 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data