1990 Rover Maestro — MOT failures & pass rate

The 1990 Rover Maestro passed 81.3% of its 262 recorded MOT tests. That is 3.1 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 21.8%. Failures cluster in brakes, emissions & environmental and suspension.

81%
Pass rate
262
MOT tests analysed
18.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
32.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (8.8%) and emissions & environmental (6.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, non catalyst emissions and steering rack — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 16 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 24.2% in the 30-60k band and 12.5% in the 120-150k band, a 11.7-point spread.

Emissions & environmental is the most common advisory, noted on 21.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 20.8% in 2021 to 14.3% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1990 Maestro 18.7% cars avg 21.4% National avg 21.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1990 Rover Maestro
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 8.8% 23
2 Emissions & environmental 6.5% 17
3 Suspension 6.1% 16
4 Body, structure & corrosion 6.1% 16
5 Lighting & signalling 5.7% 15
6 Visibility 4.2% 11
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 8.8% Emissions & environmental 6.5% Suspension 6.1% Body, structure & corrosion 6.1% Lighting & signalling 5.7% Visibility 4.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1990 Rover Maestro
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas16
2Non catalyst emissions14
3Steering rack13
4Service brake performance9
5Integral vehicle structure condition9
6Service brake imbalance8

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1990 Rover Maestro
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Emissions & environmental 21.8% 57
2 Suspension 18.7% 49
3 Body, structure & corrosion 14.5% 38
4 Brakes 12.6% 33
5 Visibility 7.6% 20
6 Tyres 7.2% 19

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 24.2% 60-90k 14.0% 90-120k 27.3% 120-150k 12.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1990 Maestro
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 66 24.2%
60-90k 86 14.0%
90-120k 44 27.3%
120-150k 32 12.5%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1990 Maestro
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 53 20.8%
2022 58 22.4%
2023 57 19.3%
2024 52 15.4%
2025 42 14.3%

What to check before buying a 1990 Maestro

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: brakes accounted for 8.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1990 Rover Maestros pass their MOT?

81.3% of the 262 1990 Rover Maestro MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 18.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1990 Rover Maestro?

Brakes, recorded in 8.8% of tests, followed by emissions & environmental (6.5%).

Does the 1990 Maestro get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 24.2% in the 30-60k band to 12.5% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 262 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data