1996 Rover 216 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 1996 Rover 216 passed 73.2% of its 519 recorded MOT tests. All cars of a similar age fail 24.7% of the time, so this is 2.0pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in emissions & environmental, lighting & signalling and brakes.

73%
Pass rate
519
MOT tests analysed
26.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
26.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — emissions & environmental (13.5%) and lighting & signalling (11.6%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, service brake performance and component mounting prescribed areas — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 124 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 27.8% in the 30-60k band and 33.9% in the 120-150k band, a 6.2-point spread.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 25.1% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 28.7% in 2021 to 23.1% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1996 216 26.8% cars avg 22.7% National avg 24.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1996 Rover 216
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Emissions & environmental 13.5% 70
2 Lighting & signalling 11.6% 60
3 Brakes 10.6% 55
4 Body, structure & corrosion 9.4% 49
5 Suspension 5.8% 30
6 Visibility 4.6% 24
Share of tests failing on each category Emissions & environmental 13.5% Lighting & signalling 11.6% Brakes 10.6% Body, structure & corrosion 9.4% Suspension 5.8% Visibility 4.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1996 Rover 216
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions124
2Service brake performance49
3Component mounting prescribed areas25
4Joints24
5Headlamp aim22
6Exhaust system20

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1996 Rover 216
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 25.1% 130
2 Brakes 22.5% 117
3 Tyres 21.0% 109
4 Body, structure & corrosion 19.9% 103
5 Other defects 15.8% 82
6 Emissions & environmental 15.4% 80

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 27.8% 60-90k 20.9% 90-120k 30.9% 120-150k 33.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1996 216
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 126 27.8%
60-90k 158 20.9%
90-120k 136 30.9%
120-150k 56 33.9%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1996 216
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 136 28.7%
2022 125 28.0%
2023 100 26.0%
2024 80 26.3%
2025 78 23.1%

What to check before buying a 1996 216

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: emissions & environmental accounted for 13.5% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1996 Rover 216s pass their MOT?

73.2% of the 519 1996 Rover 216 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 26.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1996 Rover 216?

Emissions & environmental, recorded in 13.5% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (11.6%).

Does the 1996 216 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 27.8% in the 30-60k band to 33.9% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 519 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data